SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Guj) 134

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA and J.B.PARDIWALA, JJ.
NIKHIL T PARIKH - SOLE PROPREITOR OF PARIKH & PARIKH & 55....Petitioner(s)
Versus
UNION OF INDIA THRO SECRETARY & 14....Respondent(s)
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 17040 of 2012 With WRIT PETITION (PIL) NO. 211 of 2012
Decided on: 07/05/2014

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared
MR MIHIR THAKORE, SR.ADVOCATE with MS AMRITA M THAKORE, ADVOCATE for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 -56
MR ANSHIN H DESAI, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 1
MR SN SHELAT, SR.ADVOCATE with MS DHARMISHTA RAVAL, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 2 MS. SHAILI A KAPADIA, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 3
NOTICE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 5 - 12 , 15
NOTICE UNSERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 4 , 13 -14

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 226 – SEBI Act, 1992 – Section 11 – Securities Contracts (Stock Exchanges and Clearing Corporation) Regulations, 2012 – Regulations 4A, 4B and 5 – By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners herein claiming to be the Trading Members and shareholders of the Vadodara Stock Exchange Limited seeks to challenge the legality and validity of the circulars and the Securities Contracts (Regulation) – Held, words 'not exceeding' means that it confers upon SEBI discretion to determine number of stock brokers on Governing Board –Denial of right to be on Board of Management and/or denial of right to vote for Shareholders' Director is because with experience gained it has been found by SEBI that there is total conflict of interest if Trading Members are on Board of Directors – It was found that Trading Members were influencing decision making process –Even as shareholder, petitioners' other rights are protected –Petitioners have right to attend General Meeting, Special Meeting, and by majority, can participate in decision making policy at General Board –Directors are not within control of the SEBI, as is alleged –Public Interest Directors are independent Directors and it is erroneous to suggest that only Trading Members can alone provide for greater turnover and/or net worth –Court do not find any merit in any of submissions canvassed on behalf of petitioners – Writ Petition Rejected

JUDGMENT

(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA)

1. As the issues raised in both the above captioned petitions are the same, those were heard analogously and are being disposed of by this common judgment and order. However, we have considered the Special Civil Application No.17040 of 2012 filed by the Trading Members and shareholders of the Vadodara Stock Exchange Limited as the lead matter.

2. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners herein claiming to be the Trading Members and shareholders of the Vadodara Stock Exchange Limited (for short, 'VSEL') seeks to challenge the legality and validity of the circulars dated 30th May 2012 and 13th December 2012 and the Securities Contracts (Regulation) (Stock Exchange and Clearing Corporations) Regulations, 2012, issued by the Securities Exchange Board of India (for short, 'SEBI') including the notice dated 28th November 2012 issued by the VSEL on the grounds, inter alia, that the impugned circulars, regulations and notice are ultra vires the Constitution of India and are contrary to the provisions of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 and the Companies Act, 1956.

3. According to the petitioners, they are Trading Members and shareholders of the VSEL and have preferred the petition in their personal capacity as the Trading Members and also as a representative petition on behalf of the other Trading Members of the VSEL.

4. The respondent no.1 is the Union of India. The respondent no.2 is the Securities and Exchange Board of India established under the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (for short, 'SEBI Act') for the purpose of carrying out the functions assigned to it under the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 (for short, 'SCRA') and the SEBI Act. The respondent no.3 is the Vadodara Stock Exchange Limited of which the petitioners are Trading Members and shareholders.

5. The case made out by the petitioner in this petition may be summarised as under :

5.1 The VSEL, an RSE (Regional Stock Exchange) was established in the year 1990 as a company limited by guarantee. Initially, in Stock Exchanges all over the world including India, ownership and trading rights were vested upon the Trading Members of the Stock Exchanges. The VSEL was also established in the same manner and got recognition from the Government of India in the year 1990. Today, the VSEL has 289 Trading Members and 456 listed companies, out of which, 59 are exclusively listed on it. Until the expansion of the terminals of the BSE and NSE all over India, the VSEL was one of the most successful RSEs in India. In or around the year 1996-97, the turnover of the VSEL was in the range of approximately Rs.10 to 15 crore per day. Considering the share prices in those times (which would have been only 10 to 20% of today’s prices) and considering the fact that, this was prior to dematerialisation of securities in the year 2000 which led to enormous increase in trading of securities, the said per day turnover figures can be said to be enormous for those times.

5.2 Since its inception, the VSEL has initiated several steps to establish and upgrade its systems and infrastructure keeping the interest of investors in mind and in order to expand its activities. The VSEL introduced computerised system for settlement of transactions and installed systems to disseminate vital and timely information of price movement of various scrips to the investors and also set up the Investor Protection Fund to ensure increased protection of customers. Pursuant to reforms introduced whereby corporate membership in Stock Exchanges was introduced, the VSEL admitted corporate members. Recognising and appreciating the necessity of introducing Screen Based Trading at Vadodara which required a large premises, the VSEL acquired and owns a nine-storey-building having an aggreg












































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top