SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Guj) 819

M.R.SHAH, G.R.UDHWANI
GUAJRAT PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION THROUGH SECRETARY – Appellant
Versus
PARMAR NILESH RAJENDRAKUMAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MR DG SHUKLA, ADVOCATE for the Appellant(s) No. 1 HL PATEL ADVOCATES, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 49 MR AS SUPEHIA, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 9-10, 13, 15-16, 19, 21-22, 24, 29, 36, 38, 40, 48, 52-54, 56, 59, 63-65, 67-68, 70, 72, 74-76, 80, 84-85, 88-89, 91, 94, 99-100 MR DA BAMBHANIA, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 1 2 MR. JAVED S QURESHI, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 93 MS. SANGEETA VISHEN AGP FOR STATE MR. GUNVANT THAKKER, LD. FOR INTERVENER NOTICE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 87 , 97 RULE NOT RECD BACK for the Respondent(s) No. 44 , 46 RULE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 3-11, 13-14, 16-20, 23, 25, 29, 32-37, 40-41, 43-45, 47, 50, 53, 55-56, 58-59, 61-65, 67-68, 70-71, 73, 76, 78, 80-86, 93-95, 98-100 RULE UNSERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 21, 27, 74-75 SERVED BY AFFIX.-(R) for the Respondent(s) No. 39, 60, 79, Mr. VIVAN T. SHAH, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 11-12, 25-26, 28, 30-35, 37, 42, 45, 47, 50-51, 55, 57, 62, 66, 69, 71, 77-78, 82, 90, 92, 96,
LPA NO.1298 OF 2013
MS. SANGEETA VISHEN AGP FOR APPELLANT
MR. D.G. SHUKLA FOR GPSC
MR. DA BAMBHANIA FOR ORIGINAL PETITIONERS
MR. A.S. SUPHEHIA, FOR AFFECTED AND SELECTED CANDIDATES
MR. VIVAN SHAH FOR AFFECTED AND SELECTED CANDIDATES
MR. HL PATEL ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.48,

JUDGMENT :

M.R. SHAH, J.

1.0. As both these Letters Patent Appeals are against the order passed by the learned Single Judge passed in Special Civil Application No.11996 of 2012 but by different original respondents, one by the Gujarat Public Service Commission (hereinafter referred to as the “GPSC”) and another by State of Gujarat and another, both these appeals are heard, decided and disposed of by this common judgment and order.

2.0. That feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the learned Single Judge dated 23.09.2013 passed in Special Civil Application No.11996 of 2012, by which, the learned Single Judge has allowed the said Special Civil Application preferred by the respondent nos.1 and 2 herein – original petitioners (hereinafter referred to as the “original petitioners”) and has quashed and set aside the select list prepared by the GPSC for the post of Deputy Section Officer (State Secretariat Gujarat Legislative Assembly, Secretariat, Gujarat Public Service Commission) and Deputy Mamlatdar (Revenue), Class III and has directed to prepare the fresh select list after following direction as contained in para 78 of the said judgment and or












































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top