J.B.PARDIWALA
Hardik Bharatbhai Patel – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
J.B. Pardiwala, J.
1. Since the relief prayed for, in all the captioned writ applications, is to quash the selfsame F.I.R. lodged with the D.C.B. Police Station, Ahmedabad city, being C.R. No. I-90 of 2015, those were heard analogously and are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.
2. The applicants herein - original accused persons, have prayed for the following reliefs:
"21(A) Be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction and to quash and set aside the FIR lodged with D.C.B. Police Station, Ahmedabad City, recorded as C.R. No. I-90/2015, qua the present petitioner;
(B) Be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction and issued necessary direction, protecting fundamental rights of the petitioner including not to lodge frivolous FIRs against the petitioner on the basis of the same materials in any other Police Station of the State of Gujarat for the offence punishable under sections121, 121A, 124A, 153A,
Mohammed Ajmal Mohammad Amir Kasab alias Abu Mujahid v. State of Maharastra [AIR 2012 SC 3565]
Jamiludin Nasir v. State of West Bengal [2014 (7) SCC 443]
State (NCT of Delhi) v. Navjot Sandhu Alias Afsan Guru
Balwant Singh v. State of Punjab
Bengal Immunity Co. Ltd. v State of Bihar
R. M.D. Chamarbaugwala v. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.