SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Guj) 898

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
J.B. Pardiwala, J.
Hardik Bharatbhai Patel - Appellant
Vs.
State of Gujarat and Ors. - Respondents
Special Criminal Application (Quashing) No. 6330 of 2015 and Special Criminal Application Nos. 6339, 6263, 6264 and 6265 of 2015
Decided On: 01.12.2015

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant: B.M. Mangukiya, Bela A. Prajapati
For the Respondents: Mitesh Amin

Headnote:

Criminal Law - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 124-A ,153A and 153B - Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 482 - Writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction and to quash and set aside the FIR lodged with D.C.B. Police Station, Ahmedabad City, recorded as C.R. qua the present petitioner - Seeking to issue order or direction and issued necessary direction, protecting fundamental rights of petitioner including not to lodge frivolous FIRs against petitioner on the basis of same materials in any other Police Station and if any such FIRs are recorded, restrain respondents, their agents and servants from arresting petitioner for offences punishable under offences - Held, no direct challenge to the authority or the sovereignty of the Government. Tomorrow, supposing, if the Government deems fit to include the Patidar/Patel Community in the list of OBC, then probably, the agitation would come to an end. This is where lies the fine distinction between rioting for a particular purpose and high treason - An organised movement attended with violence while agitating for the inclusion of the Patidar/Patel Community in the list of the OBCs should not be viewed as an act of treason in the form of levying war - Prima facie, case of conspiracy to overawe by means of criminal force, or the show of criminal force the Government is made out. I am saying so because Section 121A of the IPC deals with two kinds of conspiracies - One conspiring within or without India to commit any of the offences punishable by Section 121 IPC and the other conspiring to overawe by means of criminal force, or the show of criminal force the Government - Though more than a prima facie case could be said to have been made out of a mammoth rioting. The riot is an unlawful assembly in a particular State of activity, which activity is accomplished by the use of force or violence - Applications partly allowed.

JUDGMENT :

J.B. Pardiwala, J.

1. Since the relief prayed for, in all the captioned writ applications, is to quash the selfsame F.I.R. lodged with the D.C.B. Police Station, Ahmedabad city, being C.R. No. I-90 of 2015, those were heard analogously and are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.

2. The applicants herein - original accused persons, have prayed for the following reliefs:

"21(A) Be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction and to quash and set aside the FIR lodged with D.C.B. Police Station, Ahmedabad City, recorded as C.R. No. I-90/2015, qua the present petitioner;

(B) Be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction and issued necessary direction, protecting fundamental rights of the petitioner including not to lodge frivolous FIRs against the petitioner on the basis of the same materials in any other Police Station of the State of Gujarat for the offence punishable under sections121, 121A, 124A, 153A, 153B and 120B of Indian Penal Code, 1860, and if any such FIRs are recorded, restrain the respondents, their agents and servants from arresting the petitioner for the offences punishable under sections 121, 121A, 124A, 153A, 153B and 120B of Indian Penal Code, 1860, based on the same material facts disclosed in the body of the aforestated FIR.

(C) Pending admission and final disposal of the present petition, be pleased to stay further investigation of the FIR being C.R. No. I-90/15 lodged with D.C.B. Police Station, Ahmedabad City - Annexure-B, qua the present petitioner;

(D) Pending admission and final disposal of the present petition, be pleased to direct the respondents, their agents and servants not to arrest the petitioners in connection with any FIR logged in any part of the State of Gujarat for the offences punishable under sections pending admission and final disposal of the present petition, be pleased to stay on the materials and facts of bundle which have been disclosed, wholly or partly, in the FIR recorded as C.R. No. I-90/15 with D.C.B. Police Station, Ahmedabad City.

(E) Be pleased to pass such other and further orders as may be deemed fit and proper."

3. The case of the prosecution may be summarized as under:

"3.1 The first informant is the Deputy Police Commissioner, Zone - 3, Surat city. It is the case of the first informant that past about four months, there is a strong and violent agitation going on in the State of Gujarat as regards the reservation for the members of the Patidar Patel Community. The applicant accused of the Special Criminal Application No. 6330 of 2015 is the Convener of a committee known as the Patidar Anamat Andolan Samiti. The applicant accused, in his capacity as the Convener of the organization, declared bandhs, convened public meetings and various other programmes as a part of the agitation. According to the organization, the Patidar Patel Community is being neglected by the State Government in respect of education and employment. In the last few months, the State of Gujarat, more particularly, the cities like, Ahmedabad, Surat, Mehsana and Rajkot witnessed worst of the riots, in which, extensive damage was caused by the members of the organization as well as the people of the Patidar community and others to the public property by torching the police stations, public buses, etc. Few innocent people also lost their lives."

4. For better understanding of the accusations, I may quote few relevant paragraphs containing the allegations in the F.I.R. as under:

"1. Article 16(4) of the Constitution of India, 1950 states as thus: "Nothing in Article 16 or in clause 2) of Article 29 of the Constitution of India shall prevent the State from making any special provision for the advancement of any socially and educationally b





























































































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top