K.M.THAKER
Hitendra Laxmichand Soni – Appellant
Versus
Shaikh & Company – Respondent
K.M. Thaker, J.
1. Heard Mr. Doshi, learned advocate for Mr. Majumdar learned advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Pawar, learned advocate for the respondent.
2. In this petition, the petitioner has brought under challenge order dated 6.2.2007 passed by learned labour Court, Ahmedabad whereby the learned labour Court rejected the Recovery Application filed by present petitioner by invoking provisions under Section 33(C-2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [hereinafter referred to as the "Act"].
3. So far as the factual background is concerned it has emerged from the record of present petition that the petitioner herein filed an application under Section 33(C-2) of the Act and raised claim/demand for sum of Rs. 2,65,500/- against present respondent. The said application was registered as Recovery Application No. 378 of 2006.
3.1. Upon receipt of the notice from the learned Court with regard to the proceedings of the said recovery application, the original opponent in the application (i.e. present respondent) filed application Exh. 7 and raised preliminary objection against
Employees State Insurance Corporation v. Natvarlal Amrutlal Shah
Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Ganesh Razak & Anr. (1995) 1 SCC 235
Punjab Beverages Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Suresh Chand
State Bank of India vs. Ram Chandra Dubey & Ors.
State of U.P. & Anr. v. Brijpal Singh (2005) 8 SCC 58
State of Madhya Pradesh and Anr. v. Bhailal Bhai
The Central Bank of India Ltd. v. P.S. Rajagopalan etc.
U.P. Electric Supply Co. Ltd. v. R.K. Shukla 1969 (2) LLJ 728
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.