SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Guj) 1671

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
Z.K. Saiyed, J.
Gujarat State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. – Appellant
Vs.
Minaben Rajesh Sanghavi and Ors. – Respondents
Civil Revision Application Nos. 244 to 247 of 2013
Decided On : 23-08-2016

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :H.S. Munshaw, Advocate
For the Respondents:V.D. Nanavati, Advocate

IMPORTANT POINT: When there is a change of use of the premises let out, the landlord is entitled to a decree for eviction.

Headnote:Gujarat Rent, Hotel and Lodging House Rent Control Act, 1947—Section 13—Registration Act, 1908—Section 49—Transfer of Property Act, 1882—Section 107, 108—Present revision applications are filed against the judgment and order passed by small causes court and appellate court evicting the original defendant from premises—It can never be said that only because of the reason that the agreement is not registered, it cannot be considered in evidence and it has no evidentiary value—Unregistered lease deed can be considered for determining the purpose for which the premises are let out as collateral purpose—When the party made an endorsement that he has no objection for exhibiting certain documents, then the principle of estoppel is applicable—Moreover, when change of use of premises is proved, the landlord is entitled to recover the possession of suit premises.

       Result—Revision applications dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

Z.K. Saiyed, J.

1. The present Civil Revision Applications are preferred by the applicant challenging the impugned judgment and order dated 12.06.2013 passed by the learned Judge of Small Causes Court, Ahmedabad dismissing the Civil Appeal Nos. 100/2011 to 103/2011 and confirming the judgment and decree dated 05.09.2011 in H.R.P. Suit Nos. 988/2008, 989/2008, 3262/2004 and H.R.P. Suit No. 3263/2004 passed by the learned Judge, Court No. 8, Small Causes Court, Ahmedabad.

2. The brief facts of the present case are as under:--

"The original plaintiffs - respondents herein leased out the premises i.e. ground floor paiki Block No. A admeasuring about 184 square yard, carpet area 1268 square feet and Block No. B admeasuring about 184 square yard, carpet area 1268 square feet of building known as "Shivprasad' situated at Hindu Colony, bungalow No. 7, Opp. Vallabhbhai Stadium, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad which is under T.P. Scheme No. 3 of Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation bearing Final Plot Nos. 221, 222, 223, 229 and 230 (for short "the suit premises") to the present applicant - original appellant - defendant on 15.08.1981 by the then owners and now the rent of the said premises is Rs. 6902.00 for each month for each block. It is the case of the plaintiffs that the suit premises is leased out for use of office purpose and land of margin is not leased out to the applicant. It is the case of the plaintiffs that the lease period has come to an end. It is further the case of the plaintiffs that the applicant - defendant is using the suit premises in breach of the lease agreement and the suit premises are being used for storage and delivery of gas cylinders to its customers and is using open land for storing gas cylinders. It is the case of the plaintiffs that the applicant - defendant has erected rooms and made construction of permanent nature. Therefore, the suits being H.R.P. Suit No. 989/2008, H.R.P. Suit No. 3262/2004 and H.R.P. Suit No. 3263/2004 came to be filed with regard to other portions of the suit premises. The plaintiffs claimed the possession of the suit premises from the defendant for breach of the provisions of the Explosive Act, for change of user on the ground of permanent construction and on the ground of nuisance and annoyance. The plaintiffs have also claimed mesne profit and permanent injunction restraining the defendant from storing and distributing gas cylinders from the suit premises and from using open land of the suit premises and from making hurdles on internal road of the society. It is submitted that H.R.P. Suit No. 988/2008 came to be filed by the present original plaintiffs to recover the possession and for mesne profit and permanent injunction in respect of block No. 1 of the suit premises. The learned Judge, Small Cause Court No. 8, Ahmedabad vide impugned judgment and order dated 05.09.2011 decreed H.R.P. Suit Nos. 988/2008 and 989/2008 whereas H.R.P. Suit Nos. 3262/2004 and 3263/2004 for permanent injunction are concerned, instead of granting permanent injunction, the learned Judge ordered that the defendant shall abide and obey the order passed by this Court in Special Civil Application Nos. 17281/2005 to 17283/2005 till the possession of the suit premises are handed over by the defendant to the plaintiffs. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and decree dated 05.09.2011 passed by the learned Judge, Small Cause Court No. 8, Ahmedabad, the defendant - Gujarat State Civil Supplies Corporation filed Civil Appeal Nos. 100/2011 to 103/2011. The Appellate Bench of Small Cause Court, Ahmedabad, vide common judgment dated 12.06.2013 dismissed the appeals and passed the order of eviction on the ground of nuisance and annoyance as per section 13(1)(c) of the Gujarat Rent, Hotel and Lodging House Rent Control Act, 1947. Hence, these Civil Revision Applications."

3. Heard Mr. K.M. Patel, learned senior counsel with Mr. H.S. Munshaw, learned advocate for the applicant and Mr. S.I. Nanavati, learned s









































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top