J.B.PARDIWALA
Mukesh Kumar s/o Jai Kishan Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
J.B. Pardiwala, J.
Since the issues raised in all the captioned petitions are more or less the same, those were heard analogously and are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.
2. For the sake of convenience, the Special Criminal Application No.5002 of 2015 is treated as the lead matter.
3. The petitioner came to be arrested on 23rd May, 2015 by the respondent No.2 under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (for short the PMLA) in connection with the ECIR/03/AMZO/2015 registered as the PMLA Complaint No.8 of 2015 for the offence punishable under sections 3 and 4 of the Act, 2002. It is the case of the petitioner that a first information report being I-C.R. No.85 of 2015 came to be registered with the Kishanwadi Police Station for the offence punishable under sections 418, 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code against four persons, namely, (i) Girish Parshottam Patel @ Tommy Patel (ii) Kirankumar Jayantilal
Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. v. Cherian Varkey Construction Co. (P) Ltd.
Bhagat Ram Sharma v. Union of India
Bhagirath v. Delhi Administration
Directorate of Enforcement v. Deepak Mahajan
Goutam Kendu v. Manoj Kumar, Assistant Director
Harshad S. Mehta v. State of Maharashtra
Jeewan Kumar Raut v. Central Bureau of Investigation
Nazir Ahmed v. King Emperor, (1936) 63 IA 372 Om Prakash v. Union of India
Roop Chandra Sharma v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment)
State of Assam v. Barak Upatyaka D.U. Karmachari Sanstha
State of Punjab v. Baldev Singh
Subrata Chattoraj v. Union of India
Union of India v. Hassan Ali Khan
Union of India v. National Federation of the Blind
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.