J.B.PARDIWALA
Anuj Hemantbhai Bhatt – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
J.B. Pardiwala, J.
1. Since the issues raised in all the captioned applications are the same and the prayer is also to quash the self-same Sessions Case No. 25 of 2016 pending in the Court of the learned Fourth Additional District Judge, Bharuch, those were heard analogously and are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.
2. Rule returnable forthwith. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent - State of Gujarat. Mr. Kashyap Joshi, the learned advocate waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent No. 2-original first informant.
3. By these three applications under Section-482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicants-original accused persons seek to invoke the inherent powers of this Court praying for quashing of the Sessions Case No. 25 of 2016 pending in the Court of the learned Fourth Additional District Judge, Bharuch, arising from the F.I.R. bearing C.R. No. I-133 of 2015 filed before the 'C' Division Police Station, District-Bharuch, for the offence punishable under Sections-306 r/w. 114 of the I.P.C.
4. The respondent No. 2 herein is the original first
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.