IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
J.B. Pardiwala, J.
Paresh Chaturbhai Patel – Appellant
Vs.
Kokilaben Manilal Patel and Ors. – Respondents
Special Criminal Application (For Maintenance) No. 9318 of 2016
Decided On : 05-05-2017
Result: Application Dismissed
J.B. Pardiwala, J.
1. By this application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the applicant has prayed for the following relief's:
"15(a) This Honourable Court may be pleased to admit and allow the present application.
(b) This Honourable Court may be pleased to call for the record and proceedings of Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 794/2009 pending before the 3rd Additional Civil Judge JMFC Mehsana and the criminal case before Gandhinagar Court.
(c) This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of Certiorari or any other writ or direction or order to direct 3rd Additional Civil Judge, JMFC Mehsana to conclude trial and final hearing of Criminal Misc. Application No. 794/2009 expeditiously.
(d) This Honourable Court may be pleased to issue a writ of Certiorari or any other writ or direction or order to quash and set aside the order passed by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Mehsana passed in Criminal Revision Application No. 158 of 2010 dated 25.06.2016 and also the order passed by the Ld. JMFC Mehsana upon Exh. 22 in CRMA 794 of 2009 dated 29.11.2010.
(e) Any other and further relief as may be deemed fit and proper in the interest of justice may pleased be granted"
2. The facts giving rise to this application may be summarised as under:
2.1 The applicant herein got married to the respondent No. 1 in the year 1989. In the wedlock, a son named "Kaushal" was born on 6th March 1990. The applicant herein has a physical disability upto 75%. The matrimonial life of the parties got disturbed on account of serious disputes. The disputes went to the extent of the wife filing a police complaint for the offence punishable under Sections 323, 498A, 504, 506(2) read with 114 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 135 of the Bombay Police Act. In the said prosecution, the applicant came be convicted and was sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment of three months. The applicant preferred a Criminal Appeal No. 55 of 2000, which came to be allowed by the Sessions Court vide judgment and order dated 31st January 2002.
2.2 It also appears from the materials on record that the respondent No. 1 filed a Hindu Marriage Petition No. 104 of 1999 before the Civil Judge (S.D.), Mehsana, for a decree of judicial separation under the Hindu Marriage Act. The said Hindu Marriage Petition, ultimately, was withdrawn by the respondent No. 1 by filing a pursis dated 24th April 2004. It was withdrawn stating that she was ready and willing to perform her part of the obligations.
2.3 It also appears that the respondent No. 1 was receiving Rs. 2,300/- per month towards maintenance under the civil law and Rs. 500/- per month under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
2.4 The respondent No. 1 also filed a Special Civil Suit being No. 402 of 2000 before the Civil Judge (S.D.), Mehsana under the Hindu Maintenance and Adoption Act and prayed for maintenance under Section 18 of the said Act. The Court concerned awarded Rs. 700/- per month towards the maintenance. It was brought to the notice of the Court concerned by the applicant that the respondent No. 1 had instituted the Hindu Marriage Petition seeking judicial separation and had also preferred an application for maintenance under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. as well as the Hindu Maintenance and Adoption Act. In such circumstances, the respondent No. 1 withdrew the Special Civil Suit No. 402 of 2000 unconditionally.
2.5 In the circumstances, which was prevailing, the applicant filed a Hindu Marriage Petition bearing No. 113 of 2001 for dissolution of marriage. The Hindu Marriage Petition No. 113 of 2001 came to be filed by the applicant herein under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act substantially on the ground of desertion. The said petition filed by the applicant herein came to be allowed by the 7th Additional Senior Civil Judge, Mehsana vide the judgment and decree dated 29th April 2006. The respondent No. 1 challenged the judgment and decree by filing the Regular Civil Appeal No. 37
Bai Tahira vs. Ali Hussain Fidaalli Chothia and Anr.
Chetankumar Naik vs. Geetaben Naik
Chanmuniya v. Virnedra Kumar Singh Gushawa
P. Kasilingam v. P.S.G. College of Technology
Ramesh Chander Kaushal v. Mrs. Veena Kaushal
Rohtash Singh vs. Smt. Ramendri and others
Smt. Rohini Kumari vs. Narendra Sinh
Saygo Bai vs. Chueeru Bajrangi
Shamima Farooqui vs. Shahid Khan
State of Bombay v. Hospital Mazdoor Sabha
Savitaben Somabhai Bhatiya v. State of Gujarat
Surendran T. K v. State of Kerala
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.