J.B.PARDIWALA
MIKIN LALITKUMAR SHAH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
1. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicants have prayed for the following relief’s :
22(a) to allow this application;
(b) to issue appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside the impugned FIR (Annexure A) being M. Case No. 5/2015 registered with Kheda Town Police Station, District Kheda and further be pleased to quash and set aside the further proceedings in connection with the impugned FIR;
(c) pending admission, hearing and final disposal of this application, to stay the investigation – further proceedings of the impugned FIR (Annexure A) being M. Case No. 5/2015 registered with Kheda Town Police Station, District Kheda;
(d) to pass any other and further orders as may be deemed fit and proper to this Hon'ble Court.
2. The case of the first informant may be summarized as under:
2.1 The respondent no.2 – original complainant lodged a complaint in writing in the Court of the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kheda, for the offence punishable under Sections-323, 504, 498(A), 506(2) r/w.114 of the
Chunduru Siva Ram Krishna v. Peddi Ravindra Babu
G. Sagar Suri v. State of U.P.
Ganesh Narayan Hegde v. S. Bangarappa
Kans Raj V. State of Punjab & Ors.
K. Ramakrsihna and Ors. V. State of Bihar and Anr.
Lalmuni Devi v. State of Bihar
Madhavrao Jiwajirao Scindia v. Sambhajirao Chandrojirao Angre
Medchl Chemicals & Pharma (P) Ltd. v. Biological E. Ltd.
Pepsi Foods Ltd. v. Special Judicial Magistrate
Rupan Deol Bajaj v. Kanwar Pal Singh Gill
Shakson Belthissor v. State of Kerala
State of W.B. v. Swapan Kumar Guha
S.M. Datta v. State of Gujarat
Taramani Parakh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.