Back
J.B.PARDIWALA
Gurukrupa Mech Tech Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
1. As the issues raised in all the three captioned applications are the same and the parties are also the same, those were heard analogously and are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.
2. The breakup of the three captioned applications is as under:-
| S. No. | Cri. M.A. | Cri. R.A. before the Sessions Court | Application Exh. No. before the Magistrate | Subject |
| 1 | 15682 of 2017 | Criminal Revision Application NO. 21 of 2016, order dated 29th May 2017 | Exh. 19 order dated 24th August 2012 | Application by the applicant for holding inquiry in relation to whether the instruments sought to be restored to the applicant/ accused is prima facie copy of the industrial design of the complainant. |
| 2 | 15685 of 2017 | Cri. Revision Application No. 19 of 2016, order dated 29th May 2017 | Exh. 20 Order dated 24th August 2012 | Application of the applicant for the possession of the machinery/ parts. |
| 3 | 15686 of 2017 | Criminal Revision Application No. 20 of 2016, Order dated 29th May 2017 | Exh. 9 Order dated 24th Au | |
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
