IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
J.B. Pardiwala, A.C. Rao, JJ.
State of Gujarat – Appellant
Vs.
Patel Akshaykumar – Respondent
Criminal Confirmation Case No. 1 of 2016, Criminal Appeal No. 1150 of 2016, 634 of 2016
Decided On : 18-02-2019
Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 363, 365, 120B, 34 and 114 - Appellants for the offences punishable and sentenced them to undergo seven years of rigorous imprisonment with fine and in default of payment of fine, to undergo further rigorous imprisonment of twelve months -Trial Court also convicted both the appellants of the offence punishable and sentenced them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a term of seven years with fine and in default of payment of fine, to undergo further rigorous imprisonment of twelve months - Held, Taking into consideration the various judgments of the Supreme Court, Court is of the view that in spite of the fact that the appellants had committed a heinous crime and murdered an innocent, helpless and defenseless boy aged four years and five months, they are liable to be punished severely, but, it is not a case which falls within the category of the rarest of the rare cases - Hence, Court set aside the death sentence and award life imprisonment - Appellants must serve a minimum of thirty years in jail without remission, before consideration of their case for premature release - However, it would be subject to the clemency power of the Executive - Appeal dismissed. (Para 141)
J.B. Pardiwala, J.
As the captioned criminal confirmation case as well as the two criminal appeals arise from a selfsame judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Mehsana at Visnagar dated 17th March 2016 in the Sessions Case No.33 of 2012, those were heard analogously and are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.
2. The Criminal Appeal No.634 of 2016 is at the instance of a convict accused namely Patel Akshaykumar, son of Kaushikbhai Ishwarbhai (original accused No.1), whereas the Criminal Appeal No.1150 of 2016 is at the instance of a convict accused namely Panchal Kuldeepkumar, son of Karshanbhai Kalabhai (original accused No.2).
3. Both the appeals are directed against the order of conviction and death sentence dated 17th March 2016 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mehsana at Visnagar in the Sessions Case No.33 of 2012, by which the learned Sessions Judge found the appellants guilty of the offence punishable under Sections 302, 364A and 120B read with 34 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code, and consequently, sentenced them to capital punishment. The Trial Court also convicted the appellants for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 365 and 120B read with 34 and 114 of the I.P.C. and sentenced them to undergo seven years of rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs. 500/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo further rigorous imprisonment of twelve months. The Trial Court also convicted both the appellants of the offence punishable under Section 201 of the I.P.C. and sentenced them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a term of seven years with fine of Rs. 500/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo further rigorous imprisonment of twelve months.
THE CASE OF THE PROSECUTION:
4. The deceased was a five year old boy. While playing with his friends in the common plot of the society on 17th March 2012 in the evening hours, the deceased went missing. In such circumstances, the father of the deceased namely Pratikkumar Ratilal Madhavlal Patel lodged a missing report at the Visnagar Police Station. The father of the deceased namely Pratikkumar Patel is engaged in the business of manufacturing of submersible pumps running in the name of 'ALLWIN Pumps Industries Limited' situated at the GIDC. The deceased was studying in the Sahjanand Primary School. After the registration of the F.I.R., the police as well as the family members started frantically searching for the missing boy. One of the boys also named Bholu, who was playing with the deceased, informed the father of the deceased that while they all were playing, one person came on a motorcycle and made the deceased, sit with him on the motorcycle and left the place. The children were playing in the common plot. The investigation revealed that the appellants herein had hatched a conspiracy to kidnap the deceased and thereafter demand a ransom of Rs. 50 Lakh from the father of the deceased. According to the case of the prosecution, the deceased was kidnapped by the original accused No.1 namely Akshaykumar as a part of the conspiracy and thereafter the deceased remained in company of the co-accused namely Kuldeepkumar Panchal (the original accused No.2). While the original accused No.2 Kuldeepkumar Panchal remained with the deceased, the original accused No.1 namely Akshaykumar Patel persistently kept on calling up the father of the deceased for the purpose of demanding ransom of Rs. 50 Lakh. On the next day i.e. on 18th March 2012, both the accused took the deceased to the village Rakhav of the Wagdod Taluka and underneath one bridge killed the deceased by slitting his throat with a blade. Thus, according to the case of the prosecution, the deceased a five year old boy was kidnapped from his lawful guardianship for the purpose of ransom and thereafter on the next day, the boy came to be
A.N. Venkatesh Vs. State of Karnataka
Aftab Ahmad Anasari Vs. state of Uttaranchal
Bhagwan Dass Vs. State (NCT of Delhi)
Dhananjoy Chatterjee Vs. State of W. B.
Ganeshlal Vs. State of Maharashtra
Gurvail Singh alias Gala and another Vs. State of Punjab
Harish Mohandas Rajput Vs. State of Maharashtra
Indra Dalal Vs. State of Haryana
Machhi Singh Vs. State of Punjab
Manu Sharma Vs. State (NCT of Delhi)
Mohmed Inayatullah Vs. State of Moharashtra
Mukesh and another Vs. State for NCT of Delhi and others
Om Prakash Vs. State of Haryan
Prakash Chand Vs. State (Delhi Admn.)
Purushottam Dashrath Borate and another Vs. State of Maharashtra
Rumi Bora Dutta Vs. State of Assam
Sanatan Naskar and Anr. Vs. State of West Bengal
Santosh Kumar Satishbhushan Bariyar Vs. State of Maharashtra ( Bariyar )
Sevaka Perumal Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Shankar Kisanrao Khade Vs. State of Maharashtra
Shatrughan Chauhan Vs. Union of India
Shivu Vs. Registrar General of Karnataka High Court
State of Andra Pradesh Vs. Gangula Satyam Murthy
State of M.P. Vs. Saleem alias Chamaru and another
State of Maharashtra Vs. Suresh
State of Punjab Vs. Gurnam Kaur
Sudhir Chaudhary and others Vs. State (NCT of Delhi)
Swamy Shraddananda alias Murali Manohar Mishra Vs. State of Karnataka
Swamy Shraddananda alias Murali Manohar Mishra Vs. State of Karnatka
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.