J.B.PARDIWALA
Pradeep N. Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
J.B. PARDIWALA, J.
1. As the issues raised in both the captioned writ applications are the same, those were heard analogously and are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.
2. The Special Criminal Application No.895 of 2010 is treated as the lead matter.
3. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs;
“(a) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ or appropriate order and/or direction, quashing and setting aside the FIR being M. Case No.1 of 2008, the charge sheet filed in the case and the further proceedings thereunder, pending before the Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhuj qua the petitioner.
(b) Pending admission, final hearing and disposal of this petition, to stay further proceedings arising from FIR being M. Case No.1 of 2008, the charge sheet filed in the case and the further proceedings thereunder, pending before the Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhuj qua the petitioner and pass all other incidental and consequential orders.
(c) To dispense with filing of
C.B.I. through S.P., Jaipur Vs. State of Rajasthan
H.N. Rishbud and Inder Singh Vs. State of Delhi
K.V. Rajendran Vs. Superintendent of Police, CBCID, South Zone, Chennai
M.C. Sulkunte Vs. State of Mysore
R.P. Kapur Vs. Sardar Pratap Singh Kairon
Rasiklal Dalpatram Thakkar Vs. State of Gujarat
Rasiklal Dalpatram Thakkar Vs. State of Gujarat
Shivjee Singh Vs. Nagendra Tiwary
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.