JUDGMENT :

K.A. Puj, J.

This petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order of termination dated 5.3.92 passed by the respondent Corporation on the ground that the services of the petitioner are not required to the Corporation and as per condition No. 9 of the appointment order, agreement of service has come to an end.

2. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner had applied on 12th December, 1990 to the respondent Corporation and the Selection Committee of the respondent Corporation, constituted as per the rules and norms of recruitment, selected the petitioner at the interview held and after following proper procedure. Pursuant to the said appointment, a contract was executed between the petitioner and the respondent Corporation for appointment to the post of Assistant (Marketing) in the Marketing Development Cell of the Corporation. It was, inter alia, stated in the said agreement that the period of service of the petitioner will be one year and that it will be governed by the Staff Service Rules of the respondent Corporation. It was further stated that the petitioner was initially appointed at Kalpataru Stores at Gandhinagar and t