B.J.DIVAN, B.K.MEHTA
Padmavati Jaykrishna – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Wealth-Tax, Gujarat III – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
B.K. Mehta, J.
This reference raises a short but interesting question about the powers of the Tribunal under section 35 of the Wealth-tax Act. Though the question is a short one its application has always posed problems before courts. Shortly stated, the facts leading to this reference are as under :
Bombay Dyeing and Manufacturing Co. Ltd.'s case
Commissioner of Income-tax v. Maharaja Pratapsingh Bahadur of Gidhaur, (1961) 41 ITR 421
Commissioner of Wealth-tax v. Arundhati Balkrishna
Hari Vishnu Kamath v. Ahmed Ishaque
Income-tax Officer, Alwaye v. Asok Textiles Ltd.
K. Subba Rao, AIR 1963 SC 1626
K.M. Shanmugam, Proprietor, K.M.S. Transport, Tanjore v. S.R.V.S. (P.) Ltd., AIR 1963 SC 1626
M.K. Venkatachalam, Income-tax Officer v. Bombay Dyeing and Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
S.A.L. Narayan Row v. Ishwarlal Bhagwandas
Sathyanarayan Laxminarayan Hegde v. Mallikarjun Bhavanappa Tirumale
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.