IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
J.R. Vora, Sharad D. Dave, JJ.
State of Gujarat - Appellant
Versus
Hiteshkumar Madhusudan Adhvaryu - Respondent
Criminal confirmation case No. 1 and Criminal Appeal No. 37 of 2008
Decided On : 17-10-2008
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Sections 366, 374, 433-A - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 302, 307 and 309 - Both above matters have arisen from the same Judgment and Order delivered by Additional Sessions Judge, in Sessions Case - Appellant of Criminal Appeal was charged for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 307 and 309 of the Indian Penal Code and vide the impugned judgment and order, the accused was found guilty for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 307 and 309 of the Indian Penal Code - Trial Judge awarded death penalty to the accused for the offences punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code while he was sentenced to undergo 10 years rigorous imprisonment and to pay fine in default, to undergo rigorous imprisonment of six months for the offence punishable under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code - No separate sentence was awarded for the offence punishable under Section 309 of the Indian Penal Code - Held, Criminal Appeal filed by the accused stands dismissed and the conviction is confirmed and sentence awarded for the offence is confirmed - While in Confirmation Case, death penalty awarded to accused by Trail Court is modified and substituted by imprisonment for life for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and life imprisonment would mean 18 years of imprisonment - Court confirm conclusion of Trial Court for not awarding separate sentence to accused for the offence punishable under Section 309 of the Indian Penal Code - Court direct that the sentence of imprisonment awarded for the offence punishable under Section 302 as well as under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code shall run concurrently - Court also direct that the period of imprisonment undergone by accused during trial be given to him in set off - Court reject the Reference made by the Trial Court under Section 366 of the Criminal Procedure Code to confirm the death sentence and consequently Confirmation Case stands dismissed - Orders accordingly
JUDGMENT :
J.R. Vora, J.
Both the above matters have arisen from the same Judgment and Order delivered by Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.3, Bharuch, on 15.12.2007, in Sessions Case No. 82 of 2007. Appellant of Criminal Appeal No. 37 of 2008 Hiteshkumar Madhusudan Adhvaryu was charged for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 307 and 309 of the Indian Penal Code and vide the impugned judgment and order, the accused was found guilty for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 307 and 309 of the Indian Penal Code. The learned Trial Judge awarded death penalty to the accused for the offences punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code while he was sentenced to undergo 10 years rigorous imprisonment and to pay fine of Rs. 500/-, in default, to undergo rigorous imprisonment of six months for the offence punishable under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code. No separate sentence was awarded for the offence punishable under Section 309 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. The learned Trial Judge referred the said Sessions Case to this Court for the confirmation of death sentence in accordance with the provisions of Section 366 of the Criminal Procedure Code and has been registered as Criminal Confirmation Case No.1 of 2008.
3. Criminal Appeal No. 37 of 2008 is preferred under Section 374 of the Criminal Procedure Code by accused against his conviction recorded by the learned Trial Judge for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 307 and 309 of the Indian Penal Code, as afore stated.
4. The facts leading to the death penalty to the accused reveals that the accused Hiteshkumar Madhusudan Adhvaryu along with his wife Geetaben, son Pujan, aged 3 years and daughter Ishwa, aged 11 years, were staying at Kailashnagar Society, Ankleshwar. The accused Hiteshkumar was serving in a medical store situated in Nityanand Hospital at Anklewshwar and deceased Geetaben wife of the accused was doing tuition for earning. The incident in question occurred at night of 13th of April, 2007. It appears that the family was passing through financial crunch and was staying in a small house at Ankleshwar. On 13th of April, 2007, while the family was taking their dinner, deceased Geetaben mentioned to the accused that their son Pujan had some skin problems and, therefore she had taken Pujan to Nityanand Hospital where in the medical store the accused was in employment. Geetaben mentioned to the accused that she inquired from the Doctor of Nityanand Hospital and came to know that accused was not going to his job for about 2/3 months. Wife Geetaben, therefore, inquired from the accused while the accused was not going to his job for last two/three months, then from where the accused was bringing money in the form of salary. According to the prosecution case, though the accused was not attending his job, he used to go out on regular hours in the morning and was returning to home in late evening. On inquiring by wife Geetaben, the accused was enraged and took out a currency note of Rs. 500/- from his pocket and thrown the same on the face of Geetaben saying that why Geetaben was talking about money all the times and further said that she should eat 500 rupees note. Geetaben kept quite and accused sat to watch TV. As a routine thereafter Geetaben prepared beds for the family and Ishwa, Pujan and Geetaben all went to sleep. The accused was angry and Geetaben was weeping at that time also. During night hours, Ishwa, though she was in deep sleep, heard some notice, therefore, awakened. She found that the accused was kicking her mother Geetaben and, therefore, Ishwa raised shouts. On hearing shouts, neighbours gathered there and inquired from the accused that why the accused was unnecessarily beating his wife and children. Accused thereupon abused the neighbours and stated them to go away as it was their personal matter. Neighbours thereafter
Bablu @ Mubarik Hussain v. State of Rajasthan
Bachan Singh v. State Of Punjab
Bheru Singh v. State of Rajasthan
Dalbir Singh v. State of Punjab
Darshan Singh v. State Of Punjab
Dhanonjoy Chatterjee @ Dhana v. State of W.B.
Ediga Anamma v. State Of Andhra Pradesh
Gopal Vinayak Godse v. State of Maharashtra
Holiram Bordoloi v. State of Assam
Jagmohan Singh v. State Of U.P.
Janki Dass v. The State (Delhi Administration)
Jayawant Dattatraya Suryarao v. State of Maharashtra
Laxman Naskar (Life Convict) v. State of W.B.
Machhi Singh v. State of Punjab
Mubarik Hussain v. State Of Rajasthan
Namu Ram Bora v. The State Of Assam And Nagaland
Prakash Dhawal Khairnar (Patil) v. State of Maharashtra
Rahul Alias Raosaheb v. State Of Maharashtra
Raja Ram Yadav v. State Of Bihar
Ram Anup Singh v. State of Bihar
Rama Subramanian v. State Of Kerala
Ratansinh Dalusukhbhai Nayak v. State Of Gujarat
Ravji Alias Ramchandra v. State of Rajasthan
Saibanna v. State Of Karnataka
Shaikh Ayub v. State Of Maharashtra
Shri Bhagwan v. State of Rajasthan
State of Gujarat v. Raghu @ Raghavbhai Vashrambhai
State of Rajasthan v. Kheraj Ram
Subhash Chander v. Krishan Lal
Sunil Baban Pingale v. State of Maharashtra
Sushil Murmu v. State of Jharkhand
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.