IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
BIREN VAISHNAV, J.
The Gujarat State Waqf Board Through Its Chief Executive Officer - Appellant
Versus
Shaikh Aunali Ismailji Ezzy - Respondent
R/Civil Revision Application No. 162 of 2020 With R/Civil Revision Application No. 186 of 2020
Decided On : 19-03-2021
Constitution of India,1950 - Article 226 - Wakf Act, 1995 - Sections 83 (1), 84 , 3 (r) , 83 (2) and 36 - Contract act - Sections 17 and 18 – Wakf property - Application prescribed form under Section 36 of Waqf Act to register one Trust by name Qubrastan Waqf, Patan - Application was to register Trust as a Waqf - Along with application, Applicant gave a declaration of Waqf in he made a statement on oath regarding the properties owned by the Waqf - Prescribed under the Act, a paper publication was made inviting objections - Registration was made of Waqf by the Board under Section 36 of the Waqf Act by an order - Trust was registered as Maulana Yakub Sahed Dargah, Daudi Bohra Samaj Qubrastan Waqf and a certificate –
Finding of the Court: Allegation of fraud by non-disclosure of necessary and relevant facts or concealment of material facts, it must be inquired into - It is only after evidence is led coupled with intent to deceive a conclusion of fraud could be arrived at - A mere concealment or non-disclosure without intent to deceive or a bald allegation of fraud without proof and intent to deceive would not render a decree obtained by a party as fraudulent - Applicants of Civil Revision Application were aggrieved by the order of registration of the Trust –
Result: Civil Revision dismissed
JUDGMENT :
1. Both Civil Revision Applications were heard together and hence are being disposed of by this common CAV Judgment.
2. Both these Civil Revision Applications have been filed under the provisions of Section 83(9) of the Waqf Act, 1995 read with Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure. These Revision Applications have been filed to challenge the order dated 22.9.2020 passed by the Gujarat State Waqf Tribunal, Gandhinagar in Appeal No.30 of 2019.
3. Civil Revision Application No.162 of 2020 has been filed by the Gujarat State Waqf Board challenging the order of the Tribunal which quashed and set aside the order dated 23.9.2019 passed by the Board. Civil Revision Application No.186 of 2020 has been filed by one Muniruddin Fakruddin Farooqi – Respondent No.1 in the Appeal before the Tribunal.
4. The facts in brief are as under:
* On 24.6.2018, the Applicant of Civil Revision Application No.186 of 2020 Muniruddin Fakruddin Farooqi raised an objection which was received by the Board on 12.3.2019. He claimed to be the Administrator of a Trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act. As per the objection so received, it was the case of the objector / Civil Revision Applicant No.186/2020 that the Trust that was registered by the order dated 20.6.2018 had a similar name as that of one of the Trusts and the objection further was that inquiry ought to be made as to the claim of the Trust regarding the properties of Waqf including Dargah and Qubrastan. On the objection being received, the Board made inquiries. An inquiry report was submitted by the members of the petitioner Board on 6.7.2019. The inquiry report prima facie recorded a finding that as per the claim of the Applicant whose Waqf was registered on 20.6.2018, there was no Dargah or Qubrastan found as claimed in the application and what was in fact found was one in the Shopping Center. The inquiry report was so filed opining that the Waqf Board had been misled into registering the Trust and, therefore, the registration ought to be cancelled. A show cause notice was issued by the Waqf Board on 25.7.2019 to the Respondent No.1 of Civil Revision Application No.162 of 2020 namely Shaikh Aunali Ismailji Ejji asking him to show cause as to why the registration should not be cancelled. In response to the show cause notice, the Respondent No.1 responded by saying that the object of the Trust was to provide facility of food and stay to the devotees to the Dargah of Molayee Yakubsaheb Dargah and there was therefore no false or a misleading statement made. The Board, however, by an order dated 23.9.2019 cancelled the registration of the Trust of the Waqf of the Respondent No.1. After the order was so made, the Respondent No.1 filed an appeal namely; Waqf Appeal No.30/2019 before the Gujarat Waqf Tribunal. The Tribunal by the order impugned in these revision applications dated 22.9.2020 set aside the order of the Board dated 23.9.2019 by which the Board cancelled the reg
Sarabjit Singh vs. Ms. Gurpal Kaur
Chintpurni Medical College And ... vs. The State of Punjab
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Rajendra Singh and Ors.
Kapra Mazdoor Ekta Union Vs. Birla Cotton Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd and Anr.
A.V. Papayya Sastry and Others Vs. Govt. of A.P. and others
Kalabharati Advertising vs. Hemant Vimalnath Narichania
Board of Wakf, West Bengal Vs. Anis Fatma Begum & Anr., Civil Appeal No.5297 of 2004
Chief Engineer, Hydel Project & Ors. vs. Ravinder Nath & Ors.
Sardar Khan vs. Syed Najmul Hasan (Seth) & Ors.
Ramesh Gobindram vs. Sugra Humayun Mirza Wakf
Aayukhan Nurkhan Pathan v. State of Maharashtra
Ashok Leyland Limited v. State of T.N. and Anr.
Chunibhai Dajibha v. Narayanrao Khanderao Jambekar
Harbhajan Singh v. Karam Singh
Patel Narshi Thakershi v. Pradyuman Singhji Arjunsinghji
Major Chandra Bhan Singh v. Latafat Ullah Khan
Kuntesh Gupta (Dr.) v. Hindu Kanya Mahavidyalaya
State of Orissa v. Commr. of Land Records and Settlement
Sunita Jain v. Pawan Kumar Jain
Patel Chunibhai Dajibha v. Narayanrao Khanderao Jambekar & Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.