JUDGMENT :

BHARGAV D. KARIA, J.

1. Heard learned Senior Advocate Mr. Asim Pandya assisted by learned advocate Mr. Aaditya Bhatt for the petitioner and learned advocate Mr. Mitul Shelat with learned advocate Ms. Disha Nanavati for respondent No. 2 through video conference.

2. Rule returnable forthwith. The Learned advocate Ms. Disha Nanavati waives notice of rule. Service of notice of Rule is dispensed with qua respondent nos. 1 and 3 and as the controversy involved in this petition is in narrow compass with the consent of the Learned advocates of both the sides, the petition is taken up for final hearing.

3. By this petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:

“(A) Be pleased to declare that the constitution of the selection committee was not accordance with the applicable law and hence, the decision dated 30.5.2019, of the selection committee is void ab initio.

(B) Be pleased to direct the Respondents to constitute an unbiased selection committee in accordance with law, and to carry out the selection process for the post of Associate Professor afresh.

(C) Be pleased to declare that the decision is dated. 30.05.2019 and su