SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Guj) 540

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
Vikram Nath, Ashutosh J. Shastri, JJ.
Heritage Trust – Applicant
Versus
Union of India – Opponent
R/Writ Petition (PIL) No. 179 of 2020
Decided On : 15-06-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Applicant :Mr Salil M Thakore assisted by Ms Krishna Shah Advocate
For the Opponent :Ms Shruti Pathak Assistant Government Pleader, Mr Kamal Trivedi Sr. Advocate assisted by Mr Ramnandan Singh, Ms Archana Uamin

Point of Law: Doctrine of public trust was thus applied in the above context by the Supreme Court as it aimed at interfering with the course of the river and also affect the forest. In the present case, there is no interference with air, river, forest, sea-shore, mountain etc. for the benefit of any private party for commercial gain. Rather the Indian Railways is coming up with a new academic block for its two premier institutes viz. NRTI and NAIR on its own land.

Headnote:

Constitution of India,1950 - Article 226 - Public trust registered - Ministry of Railways - Gujarat Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 196 - Section 2(1) - Petitioner trust and members of its Executive Committee have been given in detail and further activities of trust have also been highlighted including earlier Public Interest Litigations initiated by petitioner trust- Paragraph petition mentions fact that present petition is purely in public interest and there is no interest of any of present petitioners or trust and that Advocate is also appearing pro bono without charging any fees and there is no litigation cost incurred as such

Finding of the Court: River Beas by using heavy earth movers and bulldozers thereby carving out a huge area on bank of river Beas (a protected forest) to be given on lease to a motel known as ‘Span Resort’ for commercial purpose- doctrine of public trust was thus applied in above context by Supreme Court as it aimed at interfering with course of river and also affect forest- In present case there is no interference with air river forest sea-shore mountain etc for benefit of any private party for commercial gain- Rather Indian Railways is coming up with a new academic block for its two premier institutes case (supra) also has no application of present case where authorities were changing a greenbelt area to residential area - Supreme Court did not permit such conversion in order to preserve greenbelt- In present case as already noted above even at cost of repetition it is to be noted that there is no conversion of any greenbelt into a residential area- There is minimum interference with existing green area and whatever green area is being affected has not only been restored but also multiplied many times petitioners inasmuch as there it was a public park open to public which was being converted into man-made structure although ultimately Supreme Court set aside judgment of High Court and had permitted construction of building with previous sanction of competent authority- In present case Vilas Palace is not a public property open to public access but is a restricted property owned by Railways

Result: Petition dismissed

JUDGMENT :

VIKRAM NATH, J.

1. The Heritage Trust, a public trust registered under the Gujarat Public Trusts Act, 1950 with its registered office at Vadodara, joining with 7 Executive Committee members has filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India framed as a Public Interest Litigation.

1.1 It has been firstly prayed that the respondents i.e. the Union of India through Ministry of Railways, Rail Vikas Nigam Limited (RVNL), National Academy of Indian Railways (NAIR) and State of Gujarat, Ministry of Tourism, be restrained from constructing any building on the gardens or the area in front of the Pratap Vilas Palace, Vadodara or at any place that would obstruct the view and ambience of the palace or its gardens.

1.2 The second relief claimed is for appropriate directions commanding the respondents to take necessary steps to construct the proposed building at an alternative place which will not obstruct the view or ruin the ambience of the Pratap Vilas Palace, Vadodara or its gardens.

1.3 It is next prayed that an appropriate direction be issued to the respondents to take all steps that are necessary for protecting and preserving the Pratap Vilas Palace, Vadodara and its precincts.

1.4 Lastly, it is prayed that pending the hearing and final disposal of the petition, the respondents be restrained from taking any further steps towards constructing a building on the gardens or in the area in front of the Pratap Vilas Palace, Vadodara, or at any place which may obstruct the view or ruin the ambience of the palace or its gardens.

2. In paragraphs 1 and 2 of the petition, the credentials of the petitioner trust and the members of its Executive Committee have been given in detail and further the activities of the trust have also been highlighted including the earlier Public Interest Litigations initiated by the petitioner trust. Paragraph 3 of the petition mentions the fact that the present petition is purely in public interest and there is no interest of any of the present petitioners or the trust and that the Advocate is also appearing pro bono without charging any fees and there is no litigation cost incurred as such.

2.1 Paragraphs 4.1 to 4.14 set out in detail the brief history of the palace, detailed description of the palace building and the surrounding campus, details of the architect who designed the Pratap Vilas Palace and also about the post independence significance of the palace and recognition given by the Ministry of Railways and other authorities to the palace from time to time. We will refer to in brief about the details provided.

2.2 Pratap Vilas palace is a 106 year old historical and architectural icon of the city of Baroda and of Gujarat. The significance of this heritage property is from varied points of view: historical, cultural, architectural, artistic and ecological.

2.3 The palace was built by Maharaja Sayajirao III Gaekwad, the great reformist ruler who ruled from 1875 to 1939. Upon his passing away in 1939, Pratapsinhrao Gaekwad became the 14th and last Maharaja of the State of Baroda. The palace is named after the last Maharaja of Baroda (whose family had lived in the palace for many years). He was crowned as king from the balcony of the Palace.

2.4 Pratap Vilas Palace is Vadodara’s 2nd largest palace. It is designed in the Indo-Sarcenic style of architecture (a blend of Indian and European architectural styles) and is lined with Italian marble. The palace is built in the Renaissance and Baroque styles of architectural influences with columns and arches drawn from South, Central, North Indian and Islamic traditions. The facade flaunts a dome clad entirely with copper. The grandeur of the palace is further emphasized by the ornaments used to embellish the structure i.e. classical traits such as pediments, semi-circular arches, lantern-like elements, balustraded railings, ionic columns and domes. The palace was designed by a well known British architect, Mr. Charles F. Stevens whose two oth

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          Judicial Analysis

          SupremeToday

          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon Back to top