J.B.PARDIWALA, NIRAL R.MEHTA
SEVA MANDAL THROUGH ITS PROP. VINAY ARVINDBHAI SHAH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
J.B.PARDIWALA , J.
1. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs;
(B) Your Lordships may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus and/or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing by quashing and setting aside the proceedings pending before respondent no.3 being case no.ARE/1/ETR/575/2020;
(C) Pending hearing, admission and final hearing of the matter, Your Lordships may be pleased to direct the respondent no.3 to stay the proceedings pending before respondent no.3 being case no.ARE/1/ETR/575/2020
(D) Pending hearing, admission and final hearing of the matter, Your Lordships may be pleased to direct the respondent no.3 to stay the implementation an
Maulabax v. Sardarmal and another
Manoharlal Awal v. The State of M.P. and others
State Bank of Indore v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Indore and others
State of Karnataka vs. Shree Rameshwara Rice Mills, Thtrthahalli
Divisional Forest Officer v. Mool Chand
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.