IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI, J.
Rajendrakumar Vinodray Kamdar - Petitioner
Versus
Rajesh Nanubhai Zaveri - Respondent
R/Special Civil Application No. 2572 of 2022
Decided On : 07-04-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ application seeks certiorari relief. (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. trust details and previous applications presented. (Para 2 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. arguments for and against the charity commissioner's order. (Para 7) |
| 4. analysis of the charity commissioner's authority. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. determination of requirements for modification under section 50a. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 6. writ application rejected; no interference warranted. (Para 17) |
JUDGMENT :
1. The present writ-application is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the writ-applicants seeking the following reliefs :-
10AA. THIS HONOURABLE COURT may be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari or a writ in the nature of certiorari and/or any other appropriate writ, order or direction and may be pleased to quash and set aside the order vide Exh.56 dated 22.02.2022 (Annexure-Q) passed by Learned Joint Charity Commissioner, Bhavnagar in Scheme Application No. 3 of 2021 And may be pleased to direct the Learned Joint Charity Commissioner to decide the applications Exh-15, Exh-16 and Exh19 preferred by the petitioners first, before proceeding further in the matter to decide the scheme application no. 3 of 2021.
10BB. Pending admission, hearing and final disposal of this petition, this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to stay the implementation and execution of the order vide Exh.56 dated 22.02.2022 (Annexure-Q) passed by Ld. Joint Charity Commissioner in Scheme Application No. 3 of 2021.
[B] Pending admission, hearing and final disposal of this petition, this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to stay the further proceeding of Scheme Application No.3 of 2021 pending before the learned Joint Charity Commissioner, Bhavnagar;
[C] ANY other and further relief or reliefs to which this Hon'ble Court deemed fit in the interest of justice, may kindly be granted.”
2. The facts as stated by the writ-applicants are produced thus :-
2.1 It is stated that Shri Digambar Jain Swadhyaya Mandir Trust (for short ‘the Trust’) is a registered Public Charitable Trust which is registered vide Registration No.A/902 with the office of the Assistant Charity Commissioner Bhavnagar and the writ-applicants are trustees of the said Trust.
2.2 The said Trust was established on 25.12.1939 at Songadh, Dist. Bhavnagar. The object of the Trust is to spread religious education in the sampradaya. Shri Kanji Swami was the religious head and preacher of the said sect. The Trust was established for the purpose of religious education and to arrange various ‘Shibir’ for the said purpose and to arrange different ‘Seminar/lecture/group discussion for the purpose of spreading the religious awareness in the sect. The Trust also holds various activities and Mahotsava.
2.3 The Joint Charity Commissioner (for short ‘JCC’) framed the Scheme in respect of the said Trust in Scheme Application No.7/1981 on 27.8.1982 (page-30). On 8.9.2021, Scheme Modification Application No.3/2021 came to be filed by the respondents No.1 to 3 before the learned JCC, Bhavnagar (page-183). On 17/18.1.2022, the writ-applicants through their advocate also sent preliminary objection by RPAD. On 19.1.2022, public notice came to be issu
Chhotubhai L. Patel vs. State of Gujarat
President, Purohit Sangh vs. Prabhakar Ramchandra Gokhale
Mallikarjun Basvanappa Masute & Anr. vs. Dattatraya Krushnath Wadane & Ors.
Fakir Mohamad Abdul Razak v. The Charity Commissioner, Bombay and others
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Charity Commissioner's decision to grant consent for instituting the civil suit was based on subjective satisfaction and fulfilled all pro....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the necessity of the settlement of the scheme for the better administration of the trust under Section 50a(1) of the Trusts act, 1950, and the affi....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the directions issued by the Joint Charity Commissioner to enroll new members were without jurisdiction and in violation of Article 19(1)(c) o....
The District Judge, acting as persona designata, lacks jurisdiction to modify a public trust scheme without express provision, necessitating adherence to statutory procedures under the Public Trusts ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to set aside orders and maintain directions for the final decision of change reports within a specified time frame, consideri....
The exercise of jurisdiction under Section 47 of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950, by the Charity Commissioner is subject to specific conditions precedent, including the absence of a validly c....
Modifications to a trust's scheme must be made under Section 92 of the Civil Procedure Code, and historical context and limitations on modifying the scheme should be considered.
The court affirmed that the modification of schemes established under earlier legislation is permissible under the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959, and that the statuto....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.