SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Guj) 1162

S.G.SHAH
VASANTBHAI SONI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Advocates appeared:
For the Applicant(s) :Mr Deep D Vyas, Advocate.
For Respondent(s):Mr Nikul K Soni, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

S.G. SHAH, J.: -

1. Rule. Mr. Manan Mehta, learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service of notice of rule for Respondent No.1 - State of Gujarat as well as Mr. Nikul K. Soni, learned -advocate waives service of notice of Rule for Respondent No.2.

2. Heard learned advocates for the respective parties. Perused the record.

3. The petitioner is original accused in Criminal Case No.756 of 2006 preferred by respondent no.2 under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act, wherein, petitioner has been convicted and ordered to undergo imprisonment of 1 year with a direction to pay Rs.10,00,000/- being amount of cheque as compensation to the complainant. When such order of conviction was challenged in Criminal Appeal No.25 of 2012, by impugned judgment and order dated 24.4.2015, the Sessions Court of Vadodara has confirmed the judgment of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vadodara by rejecting the appeal. While challenging such impugned judgment in filing Revision Petition, there is delay of 281 days and, therefore, petitioner has filed this application to condone such delay. The application has been opposed by the respondent. Whereas, it is contended by the petitioner that when appeal w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top