Back
Rameshbhai Bhagwanbhai Jadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Nikhil S. Kariel, J.
1. Heard learned Advocate Mr. Harshit S. Tolia on behalf of the appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 499 of 2018, learned Advocate Mr. B.M. Mangukiya on behalf of the appellants in Criminal Appeal Nos. 603 of 2021 and 854 of 2021, learned Advocate Mr. R.J. Goswami on behalf of the appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 880 of 2019, learned APP Mr. L.B. Dabhi for the respondent-State and learned Advocate Ms. Megha Jani for the respondent No. 2-first informant in all these matters.
2. These appeals are filed by the appellants, under Section 14-A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 read with Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for being released on regular bail in connection with F.I.R. registered as CR - I No. 127 of 2016 on 11.07.2016 with Una Police Station, District Gir Somnath, for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 397, 395, 365, 355, 354, 342, 147, 148, 149, 324, 323, 504, 506(2), 120(B), 201, 166A, 167, 466, 177, 204, 294(b), 505(1)(b), 509, etc. of the Indian Penal Code; Sections 135 of the Gujarat Police Act; Sections 3(1)(e), (r), (s), (u), 3(2)(5a), 3(1)(d), 3(1)(za)(E), 3(1)(w)(i),(
The court ruled that the applicant, as the prime accused in serious offences, cannot be granted bail due to the risk of trial tampering and his history of absconding, despite delays in the trial proc....
The judgment established the principle that the right to individual liberty must be balanced with the interest of society, especially when there is prolonged detention without commencement of trial a....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
