SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Guj) 855

Abhishek Industrial Service Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Nathabhai Bhagwanjibhai Rathod – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
P.S.Gogia, T.R.Mishra, Premal Joshi, T.R.Mishra, Premal Joshi, P.S.Gogia, Advocates

JUDGMENT :

1. RULE. Learned Advocate Mr. T.R.Mishra waives service of Rule on behalf of respondent No.1 and learned Advocate Mr.Premal Joshi waives service of Rule on behalf of respondent No.2 in Special Civil Application No.10438 of 2017, learned Advocate Mr.Premal Joshi waives service of Rule on behalf of respondent No.1 and learned Advocate Mr.P.S.Gogia waives service of Rule on behalf of respondent No.2 in Special Civil Application No.12842 of 2017 and learned Advocate Mr.T.R.Mishra waives service of Rule on behalf of respondent No.1 and learned Advocate Mr.P.S.Gogia waives service of Rule on behalf of respondent No.2 in Special Civil Application No.2325 of 2018.

2. These three petitions are challenging the same award of the Labour Court, Junagadh dated 02.02.2017 in Reference (T) No.101 of 2006. The petitioner of Special Civil Application No.10438 of 2017 is a contractual employer, the petitioner of Special Civil Application No.2325 of 2018 is a principal employer and Special Civil Application No.12842 of 2017 is filed by the workman. By the impugned award, the Labour Court has ordered reinstatement of the workman without back wages and therefore, employers have filed the petiti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top