Bhartiben H. Mehta – Appellant
Versus
Babubhai Bhagwan Italiya – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
A.J.DESAI, J.
1. By way of the present appeal under section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act,1988, the appellants- original claimants have challenged the judgment dated 10/05/2012 and award dated 21/05/2012 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Auxi.), City Civil Court, Ahmedabad in Motor Accident Claims Petition No.474 of 2003 for enhancement of amount of compensation awarded by the Tribunal as well as findings of the Tribunal about negligence of the driver of the car, in which, the deceased was traveling, to the extent of 20%.
2. The appeal came to be admitted vide order dated 04/09/2012. As per the order dated 12/01/2015, record and proceedings were called for from the learned Tribunal, which has been received by the Registry and has been placed for perusal of this court at the time of final hearing today for deciding the appeal finally.
3. We have heard Mr.Ketan Dave, learned advocate as well as Mr.Rajesh Shah, learned advocate appearing for the appellants as well as Mr.Palak Thakkar, learned advocate appearing for the contesting respondent-Insurance company, who had insured the vehicle i.e. truck bearing registration No.GJ-2U- 8702, with which the vehicle of the deceas
The court ruled that the absence of the truck driver required an inference of sole negligence, overturning the Tribunal's finding of contributory negligence against the deceased.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the proper attribution of contributory negligence and the computation of just and reasonable compensation.
The court found the deceased was not negligent in causing the accident, attributing 100% negligence to the other driver, and recalculated compensation based on proper income assessment.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of principles of negligence, contributory negligence, and composite negligence in determining liability and compensation in motor a....
words used are ’below 40 years’ and unless it is clarified that the deceased was below 40 years, addition of 40% is not possible.
It is settled law that at intersection where two roads cross each other, it is duty of a fast moving vehicle to slow down and if driver did not slow down at intersection, but continued to proceed at ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of principles of negligence and contributory negligence in motor accident cases, along with the determination of compensation for f....
Point of Law : Purpose of keeping compensation is to safeguard the interest of the claimants.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.