Dajabhai – Appellant
Versus
Mancharam Dwarkadas Sadhu – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Rajendra M. Sareen, J.
1. Present Criminal Appeal has been preferred by the appellant-original complainant under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 against the judgment and order dated 21/01/2019 passed by the learned 7th Additional Sessions Judge, Anjar, Kachchh in Special (Atrocity) Case No. 28 of 2015 (Old Special (Atrocity) Case No. 4 of 2012 acquitting the respondent Nos. 1 and 2-original accused Nos. 1 and 2 from the offence punishable under sections 302 and 114 of Indian Penal Code and under section 3(2)(5) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocity) Act (hereinafter referred to as “the Atrocity” Act) and under section 135 of the Gujarat Police Act.
2. Facts of the case, in brief, are as under:
The appellate court must uphold acquittals unless the trial court's decision is perverse or lacks evidentiary support, reinforcing the presumption of innocence.
The judgment underscores the principle of presumption of innocence, the requirement for clear and convincing evidence to establish guilt, and the reluctance to disturb a finding of acquittal without ....
The judgment reinforces the principle of presumption of innocence and the requirement for clear and convincing evidence to establish guilt, emphasizing the reluctance to disturb a finding of acquitta....
The appellate court upheld the acquittal of the accused, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the importance of reliable evidence for a conviction.
The appellate court must uphold acquittals unless the prosecution's evidence conclusively proves guilt beyond reasonable doubt, affirming the presumption of innocence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.