Back
SANGEETA K. VISHEN
Raliyatben Popatbhai Thummar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. By this petition, inter alia, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for quashing and setting aside the order dated 08.10.2015 passed by the Special Secretary, Revenue Department (Appeals) (hereinafter referred to as "the learned Secretary") and the order dated 27.09.2013 passed by the Collector.
2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the two orders by which, entry nos.1616 and 1617, both dated 27.02.1986, were taken in suo motu revision and have been quashed and set aside.
3. Tersely stated are the facts.
it was impermissible to Collector to have taken the entries nos.2208 and 2209 in suo motu revision after a period of almost close to five years. Therefore, the exercise of power by the Collector in t....
The power to initiate proceedings under Section 9 of the Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 is subject to the principles of natural justice and the requirement....
Point of Law : Powers under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to interfere with a finding within the jurisdiction of inferior tribunal except where the findings are perverse and not based on a....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
