Back
S. H. VORA, RAJENDRA M. SAREEN
State of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Sanjayrav Ashokrabv Ompure – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Rajendra M. Sareen, J.)
1. Present Criminal Appeal has been preferred by the appellant – State of Gujarat under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 against the judgment and order dated 29/12/1995 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Vadodara in Sessions Case No.25 of 1994 acquitting the respondent Nos.1 to 4 – original accused Nos.1 to 4 from the offence punishable under sections 304-B, 498-A, 201 and 114 of Indian Penal Code.
It is pertinent to note that the appeal against the respondent Nos.2 to 4 – original accused Nos.2 to 4 has been dismissed at the time of admission of the appeal vide order dated 27/08/1996. Hence, the present appeal is proceeded against the respondent No.1 – original accused No.1.
2. The crux of the case of the prosecution is as under:-
It is alleged by the complainant Sonu Jagtap that all the respondent No.1 – husband, respondent Nos.2 and 3 – sisters-in-law and respondent No.4 – mother-in-law inflicted physical and mental torture and taunted her on the aspect of dowry and compel the deceased to commit suicide and hence, the deceased on 29/08/2992 poured kerosene on herself and set her ablaze.
3. On the basis of the said com
The judgment reaffirms the presumption of innocence in favor of the accused in acquittal appeals and underscores the requirement for clear and compelling evidence to overturn a judgment of acquittal.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the presumption of innocence, the requirement of proving cruelty or harassment for dowry, and the appellate court's reluctance to interfere with th....
The presumption of innocence, the need for clear evidence to prove guilt, and the reluctance to disturb a finding of acquittal unless it is perverse or unsustainable in law.
The prosecution must prove charges beyond reasonable doubt; acquittal is upheld when evidence does not convincingly establish guilt.
The presumption of innocence in favor of the accused and the requirement for clear and convincing evidence to prove guilt, especially in cases of acquittal.
The appellate court upheld the acquittal of the accused due to insufficient evidence and contradictions in witness testimonies, reinforcing the presumption of innocence.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
