Back
State Of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Chimanbhai Thakorbhai Chauhan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Rajendra M. Sareen, J.
1. Present Criminal Appeal has been preferred by the appellant - State of Gujarat under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 against the judgment and order dated 16/09/1999 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Surat in Sessions Case No.49 of 1992 acquitting the respondent Nos.1 to 3 - original accused Nos.1 to 3 from the offence punishable under sections 498A, 306, 304B and 114 of Indian Penal Code.
2. Facts of the case, in brief, are as under:- The marriage of the deceased was solemnized with the respondent No.2 on 15/02/1990 as per the customs and in accordance with the wish and will of the family members and after the marriage, the deceased started residing at her matrimonial home. The deceased was having good married life till her death. As per the case of the prosecution, the respondents were physically and mentally harassing the deceased and were demanding dowry of Rs.50,000/- for purchasing new house where the deceased and her husband - respondent No.2 can reside separately and due to the physical and mental harassment and demand of dowry, the deceased committed suicide on 23/01/1992. As such, the complaint was filed by
The judgment reaffirms the presumption of innocence in favor of the accused in acquittal appeals and underscores the requirement for clear and compelling evidence to overturn a judgment of acquittal.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the presumption of innocence, the requirement of proving cruelty or harassment for dowry, and the appellate court's reluctance to interfere with th....
The presumption of innocence, the need for clear evidence to prove guilt, and the reluctance to disturb a finding of acquittal unless it is perverse or unsustainable in law.
The appellate court upheld the trial court's acquittal of respondents due to insufficient evidence of cruelty and abetment of suicide, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the need for substa....
The prosecution must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in cases of acquittal, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the need for reliable evidence linking alleged cruelty to suicide.
The prosecution must prove charges beyond reasonable doubt; acquittal is upheld when evidence does not convincingly establish guilt.
The court emphasized the need for the accused to explain the injuries and the circumstances of the death, and highlighted the presumption under Sec. 113-B of the Indian Evidence Act.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
