Dhirubhai Ramchandra Patel vs Official Liquidator Of The Marsden Spinning

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Guj) 1029

BHARGAV D. KARIA
Dhirubhai Ramchandra Patel – Appellant
Versus
Official Liquidator Of The Marsden Spinning – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant : Mr. MI Hava, Mr.Chanakya Bhavsar.
For the Respondent:Ms. P.J. Davawala, Mr. S.N. Shelat, Senior Advocate for Mr. M.G. Nagarkar.

Table of Content
1. factual background regarding property lease and liquidation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
2. arguing claims regarding rent arrears and land possession. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)
3. court's analysis on lease validity and implications of the rent act. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32)
4. legal debate on applicability of prior judgments and lease terms. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44)
5. final ruling on case application and dismissal, allowing claims to state systems. (Para 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49)

JUDGMENT :

1. Company Application No.294/2009 is filed by the legal heir of original lessor of land admeasuring 57870 sq. mtrs. situated at survey nos.474 and 476 at Rakhial, District Ahmedabad, Town Planning Scheme No.11, Final Plot No. 15 (here-in-after referred to as “the subject land”).

2. One Ramji Harilal, the predecessor-in-title of the applicant had executed a lease deed on 20.06.1919 through his aunt Ichaben Bapuji Bajibhai, as he was minor at the relevant time

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(Guj) 1029

BHARGAV D. KARIADhirubhai Ramchandra Patel – AppellantVersusOfficial Liquidator Of The Marsden Spinning – Respondent

Cases Referred (22)

BHARGAV D. KARIA
Dhirubhai Ramchandra Patel – Appellant
Versus
Official Liquidator Of The Marsden Spinning – Respondent