IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
Sonia Gokani, Nisha M. Thakore, JJ.
Dipak Kashinath Parthe - Appellant
Versus
Geeta Rameshbhai Varma – Defendant
R/First Appeal No. 1342 of 2022
Decided On : 21-10-2022
Divorce - Mutual Consent - Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Order XXIII of the Code of Civil Procedure - Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
Fact of the Case:
The parties had been living separately for more than 10 years and decided to get separated from each other by executing a deed of divorce. The court acknowledged the consent terms arrived at between the parties and dissolved the marriage by mutual consent.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the marriage solemnized between the parties was dissolved by mutual consent and directed the parties to scrupulously follow the consent terms and stipulated time limits.
Issues: The main issue was the dissolution of the marriage by mutual consent and the enforcement of the consent terms.
Ratio Decidendi: The court exercised its discretion under Order XXIII of the Code of Civil Procedure to record the compromise between the parties on the subject matter, other than that of the suit, instead of relegating them to go for the divorce by mutual consent under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
Final Decision: The court disposed of the present appeal and directed the parties to withdraw the cases and follow the consent terms without any default.
ORDER :
(Sonia Gokani, J.)
1. The matter has already been admitted on 05.05.2022. Today the consent terms arrived at between the parties, resulting into the dispute to end permanently, have been brought on the record by learned advocate urging that in wake of this, she should be permitted to withdraw this matter.
2. The parties have already taken the divorce in a customary way making it also explicit therein that wherever necessary, parties may choose to opt for the consent decree of a competent court. Considering the nature of the dispute between the parties, instead of relegating them to go for the divorce by mutual consent under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 as both of them are the Hindus, this Court has chosen to exercise that discretion as Order XXIII of the Code of Civil Procedure also provide for recording the compromise between the very parties on the subject matter, other than that of the suit.
3. The terms of their agreement, translated officially by the Department of Translation, are as follow:
We, the above mentioned parties, execute this deed of divorce and the detail thereof is given below.
(1) The marriage of the parties was solemnised on 14/03/2012 as per the Hindu rituals and customs of caste at B-6, Nikunj Apartment, Siddhnath Road, Vadodara. We registered the said marriage in the Office of the Marriage Registrar in Vadodara Municipal Corporation with Sr. No – 02674 on 30/04/2012. Since then the parties had been living together as husband and wife.
(2) Some time after the marriage, we had difference of opinions in trivial matters and we became displeased with each other. As we were different from each other in behaviour and thinking and as there was difference in our ideology, altercations and disputes occurred between us which made our relationship acrimonious. Therefore, we had to live separately from each other. The parties have been living separately from each other for more than 10 years from June – 2012. The family members of the parties made many efforts for the compromise between us, but all of them were unsuccessful. In the present circumstances, as the parties are unable to live together, the parties have voluntarily decided to get separated from each other and executed the present deed of divorce.
(3) This deed ends the relationship between the parties as husband and wife. The status of husband and wife is abolished between the parties. Thus, as the marriage of the parties has come to an end and henceforth, the parties shall be free to marry willingly. No parties shall raise objection or dispute thereof in future.
(4) As of now, the transaction took place between the parties at the time of marriage has been settled mutually and no transaction of any articles is to be done by any of the parties henceforth. No transaction of any jewelry is pending.
(5) During this wedlock, the party of the first part has not given birth to any child or the respondent no.1 is not pregnant through party of the second part and both the parties are separate from each other since June, 2012.
(6) As both the parties have ended the marriage life willingly and mutually and the party of the second part has paid lumpsum amount of Rs.1,00,000/- today by cash and amount of Rs.4,00,000/- by Cheque No.254583 dated 14/07/2022 drawn on Central Ba
The court applied the provisions of Order XXIII of the Code of Civil Procedure and Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 to dissolve the marriage by mutual consent and enforce the consent terms....
The judgment emphasizes the importance of mutual consent for divorce under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, and the significance of Rule 31 of the Family Courts (Maharashtra) Rules, 1987....
Consent for mutual divorce must remain until the petition is disposed of; withdrawal at any time before that invalidates the petition.
A party may withdraw consent for mutual divorce at any time before the decree, affecting maintenance claims.
The necessity of mutual consent for divorce under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act is emphasized, invalidating decrees made post-withdrawal of consent.
The court upheld the settlement agreement and approved the divorce by mutual consent based on the provisions of Section 13B(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, and the willingness of the parties to p....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the right to withdraw consent in a petition for dissolution of marriage by mutual consent is subject to the provisions of the relevant law and....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that once a party has acted upon the consent terms and fulfilled their obligations, the other party cannot unilaterally withdraw consent unless the....
Point of law: Requirement under Section 13B(2) of Hindu Marriage Act is the “motion of both parties”.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.