VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI
Nareshbhai Maheshkumar Khushlani – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
The role of a witness in a sale deed primarily involves identifying and attesting to the execution of the document. A witness is expected to observe the signing of the sale deed and verify the identities of the parties involved, ensuring that the signatures are genuine and that the document is executed voluntarily. The witness's function is to confirm that the sale deed was signed in their presence and that the signatories are known to them or have been properly identified, thereby providing a layer of authenticity and credibility to the transaction (!) .
Importantly, a witness in a sale deed is generally not responsible for verifying the legal ownership of the property or the accuracy of the representations made therein. Their role does not extend to ascertaining whether the sale is lawful or whether the person executing the deed has the authority to do so. The witness's obligation is limited to witnessing the signing process and possibly signing the document to attest to this (!) .
Furthermore, the legal position clarifies that a witness's involvement does not imply any knowledge or verification of the underlying title or ownership rights. The witness's function is procedural, and they are not required to ensure that the property being sold is legitimately owned or that the sale is free from fraud. Their role is to provide an impartial attestation that the document was executed by the parties in their presence, which can be used as evidence of proper execution but does not extend to assessing the validity of the transaction itself (!) .
In summary, the role of a witness in a sale deed is to observe and attest to the signing of the document, confirm the identities of the parties, and ensure that the signing was voluntary and in their presence. They are not responsible for verifying ownership rights or the legality of the sale, and their involvement does not constitute an endorsement of the transaction's validity beyond witnessing its execution.
ORDER :
1. By way of the present application, the applicant herein has prayed for the following reliefs :
B. Your Lordships may be pleased to quash and set aside the impugned FIR bearing I-C.R. No. 30 of 2016 lodged before the Sardarnagar Police Station and also be pleased to quash and set aside the charge-sheet filed in respect of the said FIR being C.C. No. 597 of 2016 at Annexure-A and Annexure-B respectively.
C. Pending hearing and final disposal of this petition, Your Lordships may be pleased to stay the further proceedings of FIR bearing I-C.R. No. 30 of 2016 lodged before the Sardarnagar Police Station and the charge-sheet filed in respect of the said FIR being C.C. No. 597 of 2016 at Annexure-A and Annexure-B respectively.
D. Such other and further relief or relieves as may be deem fit, just and proper, in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
2. Mr. Desai, learned counsel appearing for the applicant submitted that it is the case of the complainant that Plot No. 409 being City Survey No. 9883 admeasuring 161.61 sq.mtrs. situated at Sardarnagar, Ahmedabad was allotted to refugee, who had come from Pakistan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.