SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Judgement Key Points

The role of a witness in a sale deed primarily involves identifying and attesting to the execution of the document. A witness is expected to observe the signing of the sale deed and verify the identities of the parties involved, ensuring that the signatures are genuine and that the document is executed voluntarily. The witness's function is to confirm that the sale deed was signed in their presence and that the signatories are known to them or have been properly identified, thereby providing a layer of authenticity and credibility to the transaction [p_9].

Importantly, a witness in a sale deed is generally not responsible for verifying the legal ownership of the property or the accuracy of the representations made therein. Their role does not extend to ascertaining whether the sale is lawful or whether the person executing the deed has the authority to do so. The witness's obligation is limited to witnessing the signing process and possibly signing the document to attest to this [p_9].

Furthermore, the legal position clarifies that a witness's involvement does not imply any knowledge or verification of the underlying title or ownership rights. The witness's function is procedural, and they are not required to ensure that the property being sold is legitimately owned or that the sale is free from fraud. Their role is to provide an impartial attestation that the document was executed by the parties in their presence, which can be used as evidence of proper execution but does not extend to assessing the validity of the transaction itself [p_9].

In summary, the role of a witness in a sale deed is to observe and attest to the signing of the document, confirm the identities of the parties, and ensure that the signing was voluntary and in their presence. They are not responsible for verifying ownership rights or the legality of the sale, and their involvement does not constitute an endorsement of the transaction's validity beyond witnessing its execution.
Back Icon Back Next Next Icon
AI icon Copy icon AI Message Bookmarks icon Share icon Up Arrow icon Down Arrow icon Zoom in icon Zoom Out icon Print Search icon Print icon Download icon Expand icon Close icon
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Sound Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Guj) 969

VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI
Nareshbhai Maheshkumar Khushlani – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent





Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant : Mr. Dipen Desai.
For the Respondent: Ms. Maithili D. Mehta, APP.

Headnote: Read headnote

ORDER :

1. By way of the present application, the applicant herein has prayed for the following reliefs :

    “A. Your Lordships may be pleased to admit and allow this application.

B. Your Lordships may be pleased to quash and set aside the impugned FIR bearing I-C.R. No. 30 of 2016 lodged before the Sardarnagar Police Station and also be pleased to quash and set aside the charge-sheet filed in respect of the said FIR being C.C. No. 597 of 2016 at Annexure-A and Annexure-B respectively.

C. Pending hearing and final disposal of this petition, Your Lordships may be pleased to stay the further proceedings of FIR bearing I-C.R. No. 30 of 2016 lodged before the Sardarnagar Police Station and the charge-sheet filed in respect of the said FIR being C.C. No. 597 of 2016 at Annexure-A and Annexure-B respectively.

D. Such other and further relief or relieves as may be deem fit, just and proper, in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

Read more document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top