Ravi Jayantibhai Vankar vs State of Gujarat

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Guj) 970

VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI
Ravi Jayantibhai Vankar – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant : Mr. Vicky B. Mehta.
For the Respondents: Ms. Dishaben B. Saliya, Ms. Maithili D. Mehta, APP.

ORDER :

1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Ms. Dishaben B. Saliya, learned counsel waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the respondent no.2 and Ms. Maithili D. Mehta, learned APP waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the respondent no.1 – State.

2. Heard the learned counsels appearing for the respective parties.

3. By way of this Application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as “the Code”), the applicant herein has prayed for the following reliefs :

“(A) Your Lordships may be pleased to admit and allow this application;

(B) Your Lordships may be pleased to quash and set aside the impugned FIR being I-C.R. No. 148 of 2019 registered with Shaher Kotda Police Station, Ahmedabad (City) for the offence punishable under section 363, 366, 376(3) of the Indian Penal Code and section 3, 4, 12, 11(6) of the POCSO Act, and charge-sheet being No. 125 of 2019 and Special POCSO Case No. 22 of 2019 registered and pending before the learned City Civil Court, Ahmedabad;

(C) Pending admission, hearing and final disposal of the present petition, Your Lordships may be pleased to stay the further proceedings of Special POCSO Case No. 22 of 2019 pe