RAJENDRA M. SAREEN
STATE OF GUJARAT – Appellant
Versus
RABARI MAFABHAI RUGNATHBHAI – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
RAJENDRA M. SAREEN, J.
1. Present Criminal Appeal has been preferred by the appellant-State of Gujarat under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 against the judgment and order dated 11.02.2011 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Deesa in Special (Atrocity) Case No. 10 of 2010 acquitting the respondent Nos. 1 to 3-original accused Nos. 1 to 3 from the offence punishable under sections 447, 504, 506(2) and 114 of Indian Penal Code and under section 3(1)(10) of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocity) Act (hereinafter referred to as “the Atrocity” Act).
2. The crux of the case of the prosecution is as under:
Arulvelu and Another vs. State
Bhaiyamiyan alias Jardar Khan vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Chandrappa and Others vs. State of Karnataka
Hitesh Verma vs. State of Uttarakhand and Another
Kali Ram vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
The main legal point established in the judgment is the presumption of innocence in favor of the accused in cases of acquittal, the need for clear and compelling evidence of guilt, and the reluctance....
The judgment underscores the principle of presumption of innocence, the requirement for clear and convincing evidence to establish guilt, and the reluctance to disturb a finding of acquittal without ....
The acquittal was upheld due to the prosecution's failure to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the need for credible evidence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.