IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SONIA GOKANI, NISHA M. THAKORE, JJ.
KINJAL UDESING GOHIL – Appellant
Versus
RAKESHBHAI DEVENDRABHAI SOLANKI – Respondent
First Appeal No. 4878 of 2019, Civil Application (For Stay) No. 1 of 2019
Decided On : 06-10-2022
Divorce - Amicable Settlement - Domestic Violence Act, Code of Criminal Procedure, Indian Penal Code, Code of Civil Procedure, Hindu Marriage Act - The court discussed and referenced the Domestic Violence Act, Code of Criminal Procedure, Indian Penal Code, Code of Civil Procedure, and Hindu Marriage Act in the context of an amicable settlement between the parties. The settlement included the withdrawal of a domestic violence act complaint, waiver of rights under various provisions, and the payment of permanent alimony. The court emphasized the importance of mutual consent and the dissolution of marriage by mutual consent, and highlighted the consequences of default in the settlement agreement.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant-wife appealed the judgment and decree of dissolution of marriage, but an amicable settlement was reached between the parties. The settlement included the withdrawal of a domestic violence act complaint, waiver of rights, and the payment of permanent alimony.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that an amicable settlement had been reached between the parties, and emphasized the importance of mutual consent and the dissolution of marriage by mutual consent. The court highlighted the consequences of default in the settlement agreement.
Issues: The issues involved the appeal of the judgment and decree of dissolution of marriage, the settlement terms, and the consequences of default in the settlement agreement.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the significance of mutual consent and the dissolution of marriage by mutual consent, and highlighted the consequences of default in the settlement agreement.
Final Decision: The appeal was disposed of with the amicable settlement, and the court clarified that any default in the settlement agreement would entitle the appellant to request the revival of the petition.
ORDER :
1. This appeal is preferred seeking to challenge the judgment and decree dated 30.10.2018 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Dahod in Family Suit No. 44 of 2017, whereby the Court has de-solved the marriage which had been performed on 9th May, 2014 between the parties.
2. After the Court has substantially heard the parties, the parties had expressed their wish to explore the possibility of amicable settlement. Accordingly, they had requested the learned advocates and also learned AGP Ms. Tripathi to make an attempt. It is heartening to note that the consent terms have been arrived at as per the final settlement, which will be required to be reproduced:
The parties hereto have settled the entire dispute amicably, on certain terms and conditions; that same are reproduced herein:
1. That the appellant-wife herein has preferred the impugned First Appeal with a prayer to quash and set-aside the order and judgment dated 30.10.2018 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family court, Dahod in Family Suit No. 44 of 2017. That the opponent husband herein had filed said suit; whereby the learned Principal Judge, Family court, Dahod allowed the Family Suit No. 44 of 2017. That being aggrieved by said Judgment and decree dated 30.10.2018 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family court, Dahod present 2 appellant-wife challenged the same before this Hon’ble Court by way of the First Appeal No. 4878 of 2019.
2. On 09.05.2014 marriage of the present appellant was solemnized with opponent herein and out of the said wedlock, no child had born due to some matrimonial dispute, both are residing separately.
3. That now the matter is settled between both the parties and the opponent-husband herein is ready and willing to pay Rs. 9,00,000/- as full and final permanent alimony of to Rs. 9,0,000/- as full and final permanent alimony of to the Appellant-wife, which is also accepted by the Appellant-wife. That accordingly the appellant-wife is permanently waiving her right for getting maintenance from the opponent-husband and also permanently waives right over property/Properties of the opponent-husband. That appellant-wife is also waiving her right maintenance in future.
4. That Appellant-wife is also filed domestic violence act complaint being criminal complaint no. 383 of 2015 before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sanand, Ahmedabad which the appellant undertakes to withdraw the said complaint, on the day of receiving full and 3 final settlement amount of Rs. 9,0,000/- as full and final permanent alimony of to Rs. 9,00,000/- from the opponent-husband. The parties have amicably understood and declared that will not file any proceeding in future, against each other; under the any provision of the domestic violence act, any provision of the Code of criminal procedure, Indian Penal Code and any provision of the Code of Civil Procedure and also any provision of Hindu Marriage act.
5. That the opponent-husband is ready and willing to pay amount of Rs. 9,00,000/- full and final permanent alimony by Rs. 9,00,000/- as full and final permanent alimony of to way of equal installments. Details of the installments and postdated cheques drawn on ICICI Bank, New C.G. Road Branch, are as under:
| S. No. | Cheques No. | Date | Amount |
| 1. | 391738 | 06.10.2022 | Rs. 1,12,500/- |
| 2. | 391739 | 06.11.2022 | Rs. 1,12,500/- |
| 3. | 391740 | 06.12.2022 | Rs. 1,12,500/- |
| 4. | 391741 | 06.01.2023 | Rs. 1,12,500/- |
| 5. | 391742 | 06.02.2023 | Rs. 1,12,500/- |
| 6. | 391743 | 06.03.2023 | Rs. 1,12,500/- |
| 7. | 391744 | 06.04.2023 | Rs. 1,12,500/- |
| 8. | 391745 | 06.05.2023 | Rs. 1,12,500/- |
|
|
| TOTAL | Rs. 9,00,000/- |
6. That if the opponent-Husband fails to make full payment of 9,00,000/- to appellant-wife in that 4 case, aforesaid Rs. 9,00,000/- as full and final permanent alimony of to
The central legal point established in the judgment is the significance of mutual consent and the dissolution of marriage by mutual consent, and the consequences of default in the settlement agreemen....
A court of appeal may allow a matrimonial appeal and dissolve a marriage by mutual consent under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, by recording a settlement agreement between the parties under Order XXII....
The court recognized the validity of mutual consent divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act, allowing parties to settle alimony and custody amicably, quashing previous allegations of cruelty.
The duty of the Family Court to make efforts for settlement under Section 9 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, and the importance of compliance with consent terms in divorce proceedings.
Mutual consent for divorce under Hindu Marriage Act is acceptable when parties confirm irretrievable breakdown, allowing for the waiver of the statutory waiting period.
Irretrievable breakdown of marriage can lead to divorce where mutual agreement on alimony is established.
Court recognizes mutual consent for permanent alimony in divorce proceedings, highlighting responsibilities of parties post-separation.
The court can grant waiver of the statutory period for divorce by mutual consent based on the parties' long separation and no possibility of reconciliation, and can accept settlement terms if they ar....
The court upheld the validity of an amicable settlement in divorce cases, recognizing the irretrievable breakdown of marriage as a basis for granting a decree of divorce.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.