HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK
Raniben Wd/o. Mafabhai Bhil – Appellant
Versus
Natvarsing Ratansing Thakor – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied by the impugned judgment and order dated 29.02.2020 passed by the learned 3rd Additional District Judge, Deesa in Regular Civil Appeal No.21 of 2015 whereby the learned Additional District Judge has confirmed the impugned judgment and decree dated 18.08.2015 passed by the learned Additional Senior Civil Judge in Regular Civil Suit No.203 of 2015, the appellants have preferred the present second appeal.
2. Short facts of the present case are that the original plaintiff had filed Regular Civil Suit No.203 of 2015 before the Court of learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Deesa at Sabarkantha for cancellation of the alleged sale deed of the suit land and for taking possession of the suit land. The said suit came to be dismissed by the Trial Court on 18.08.2015. Against the said judgment and decree, the original plaintiff preferred Regular Civil Appeal No.21 of 2015, which came to be dismissed by the First Appellate Court on 29.02.2020. Feeling aggrieved by the said judgment and order, the appellants have preferred the present appeal.
3. Heard learned counsel appearing for the respective parties.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the appellants has
B.V. Nagesh v. H.V. Sreenivasa Murthy JT 2010(10) SC 551: 2010 (13) SCC 530
Dumala Vahpara Gram Panchayat v. Chunilal Tribhovandas Patel & Ors.
G. Amalorpavam v. R.C. Diocese of Madurai
Gannmani Anasuya v. Parvatini Amarendra Chowdhari
Girijanandini Devi v. Bijendra Narain Choudhary
Mahmad Ahmadbhai v. Fatmaben Abdulla & Ors. 2007(4) GLR 2789
Prajapati Abraham Nagarbhai & Anr. v. Prajapati Harjibhai & Ors.
Santosh Hazari v. Purushottam Tiwari
Mandatory compliance with Order 41 Rule 31 of the Civil Procedure Code and the need for the First Appellate Court to independently assess the evidence and provide reasons for its decision on each poi....
Compliance with procedural requirements, including the obligation to frame points for consideration under Order 41 Rule 31 of the Civil Procedure Code, is mandatory for the First Appellate Court in d....
Mandatory compliance with Order 41 Rule 31 of the Civil Procedure Code and the need for the First Appellate Court to independently assess evidence and frame points for consideration.
Mandatory compliance of Order 41 Rule 31 of the Civil Procedure Code and the requirement for the First Appellate Court to independently assess the evidence and decide the appeal after framing points ....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the mandatory requirement for the First Appellate Court to comply with the provisions of Order 41 Rule 31 of the Civil Procedure Code, including....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the mandatory nature of compliance with Order 41 Rule 31 of the Civil Procedure Code, requiring the First Appellate Court to frame points for co....
Compliance with Order 41 Rule 31 of the Civil Procedure Code and the Bombay Civil Manual is mandatory for the First Appellate Court, which must independently assess the evidence and provide reasons f....
Mandatory compliance with Order 41 Rule 31 of the Civil Procedure Code and the need for the First Appellate Court to independently assess evidence and frame points for consideration.
Mandatory compliance of Order 41 Rule 31 of the Civil Procedure Code and the requirement for the First Appellate Court to independently assess the evidence and frame points for consideration.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the mandatory nature of complying with Order 41 Rule 31 of the Civil Procedure Code and the requirement for the appellate court to independently as....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.