JUDGMENT :

N.V.ANJARIA, J.

Heard learned advocate Mr.C.B.Dastoor for the appellant and learned advocate Ms.Shruti Pathak for the respondent.

2. This appeal is directed against order dated 12.7.2022 passed by learned Judge, Family Court No.2, Ahmedabad in Civil Miscellaneous Application No.211 of 2019. It was proceedings under Section 7 read with Section 25 of the Guardian and Wards Act, 1956.

2.1 The Family Court passed final order holding that in the facts of the case and looking to the age of child which is five years, custody could not be given to the applicant, however these directions came to be issued, (i) directing respondent Mother to take the child Vihan to the place of applicant on every Sunday and on public holidays for four hours from 10:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. (ii) in the event the applicant or his wife comes to the house of the respondent to meet the child, the respondent shall not object. (iii) the applicant shall pay Rs.7000/- per month towards maintenance as well as for expenses towards medical treatment and education of the child.

3. The applicant happens to be grand father whereas respondent is the mother. It was the case of the applicant that respondent- daughter-in-law