SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 259

RAVI MALIMATH, ANAND PATHAK
Anand Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Lakhan Jatav – Respondent


Advocates:
Hridayesh Kumar Shukla and Romesh Pratap Singh for appellants; Suresh Agrawal for respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. Instant First Appeal is filed under section 19 of Family Court Act, 1984 against the order dated 22.11.2018 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Shivpuri in case No. 07/2018 (Guardian); whereby, application of respondent filed under section 6 of the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 has been allowed.

2. Precisely stated facts of the case are that respondent filed an application under section 6 of the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 (hereinafter shall be referred to as “Act of 1890”) seeking custody of his son- Ayush, aged about 2 year 3 months with the submissions that his minor son was born on 13.1.2016 and after his birth, wife of respondent namely Mala alias Manjula went to her maternal home with his minor son, where she died (suicide) on 8.4.2017. Therefore, case against respondent at the instance of appellants under section 304-B, 498-A, 506, 34 of IPC and section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition act was registered.

3. It was further alleged that he requires the custody of his minor son because his maternal grandparents are not looking after him properly with their meager financial resources and they are less literate, which ave an adverse effect over the child. Appellants are

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top