IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
Vaibhavi D. Nanavati, J.
Bhupatbhai Vallabhbhai Rabadiya - Appellant
Vs.
State Of Gujarat & others - Respondent
Criminal Misc. Application No. 12628 of 2017
Decided On : 25-11-2022
Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Section 323, 504 – Atrocities Act – Section 3(1)(r), 3(2)(va) –Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 – Section 3(1)(r), 3(2)(va) – Allegations therein absolutely silent – Consequential proceedings – Held, From bare reading of impugned FIR and position of law as referred above, no words which would humiliate could be said to have been uttered by applicant/accused herein to invoke the provisions of Atrocities Act as referred above – Alleged words also cannot be said to have been uttered in public view – Further, there is no reference of incident to have occurred in public view for which it could be within "public purview" and therefore, FIR impugned is required to be quashed – For aforesaid reasons, considering position of law and facts of present case, So far as provisions of Indian Penal Code are invoked against applicant, complaint may continue for it is not possible; summarily decide allegations under Section 323, 504 of Indian Penal Code regarding inflicting blow and kicks to the complainant – Application allowed in part.
ORDER :
1. Heard Mr. Piyush Trivedi, learned advocate for Mr. Pratik B. Barot, learned advocate appearing for the applicant.
2. By way of present application, the applicant herein is aggrieved by the impugned complaint/FIR being II-C.R. No.7 of 2017 registered with Damnagar Police Station, District : Amreli for the offence punishable under Sections 323, 504 of Indian Penal Code and under Section 3(1)(r), 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and other consequential proceedings.
3. The brief facts as stated in the FIR read thus :-
4. Being aggrieved by the impugned FIR being IIC.R. No.7 of 2017 registered with Damnagar Police Station, District : Amreli, the applicant herein is constrained to approach this Court seeking following reliefs :-
(B) Your Lordships may be pleased to quash and set aside the FIR being II-C.R. No.7 of 2017 registered with Damnagar Police Station, District : Amreli for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 504 of Indian Penal Code and u/s. 3(1)(r), 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and other consequential proceedings;
(C) Pending admission, hearing and final disposal of the present petition, Your Lordships may be pleased to stay the proceedings of FIR being II-C.R. No.7 of 2017 registered with Damnagar Police Station, District : Amreli for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 504 of Indian Penal Code and u/s. 3(1)(r), 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and other consequential proceedings;
(D) Your Lordships may be pleased to grant such other and further relief/s that may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case."
5. Mr. Piyush Trivedi, learned advocate for Mr. Pratik Barot, learned advocate appearing for the applicant submitted that the narration in the FIR with regard to the allegations against the applicant under Section 323 and 504 of Indian Penal Code would not be applicable, since there is no medical certificate on record as alleged under Section 323, though there is a reference to abusive language spoken by him to the complainant, however, Section 504 would not be attracted qua the applicant herein considering the allegation levelled against the applicant in the impugned FIR.
5.1 It is further submitted that so far as the Section 3(1)(r) and 3(2)(va) of Atrocities Act are concerned, the FIR and the allegations therein absolutely silent on the said point. Yet, because of amendment under the Atrocities Act especially under Section 3(2)(va) of the Act, since earlier language used under this Section is substituted now with the new set of terminology, there is perhaps invocation of Section 3(2)(va) in the said offence.
5.2 It is submitted that the respondent No.2 i.e. original co
FIR lacks necessary allegations to establish offences under the Atrocities Act, failing to meet legal requirements of public view and specific derogatory remarks.
The FIR under the Atrocities Act was quashed due to lack of essential elements, including public view and caste identification.
The FIR lacked necessary elements to constitute an offence under the Atrocities Act, as no derogatory remarks or public view were established.
FIR under SC/ST Act quashed absent caste-based insult, humiliation intent linked to caste, or cognizable offence ingredients; prior similar vexatious complaints indicate abuse of process for revenge.
The court held that the FIR did not satisfy the necessary elements for offences under the Atrocities Act, as the incident occurred in a private setting and lacked evidence of caste-based insult.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.