IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SONIA GOKANI, SANDEEP N. BHATT, JJ.
Neha Enterprise - Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat - Respondent
R/Special Civil Application No. 20505 of 2022
Decided on : 19-01-2023
Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - Section 29, 22(1), 30 - Gujarat Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 - Section 107, 169 - Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 - GST Rules - Rule 22(1) - Show cause notice - Cancelling registration of firm - Challenging proceedings initiated by way of show cause notice issued by department, which culminated into cancelling registration of petitioner firm – Held, Court need to make a mentioned that Court referred to Whatsapp, telegram, signal, etc. as instant messaging services at time when physical delivery of notices, post offices, courier company, etc. could not be visited due to COVID- 19 lock-down - Moreover, while so permitting Court had also directed in addition, parties to effect service of such document by e-mail on very date - And provision itself is either for postal through speed post or registered A.D. post and hence, those two modes are to be required to be served - Service is said to have been effected through registered A.D.post in wake of glaring circumstances and more particularly, extremely weak foundation of content of notice, which this Court in Aggarwal Dying has not sustained - This petition deserves to be allowed quashing and setting aside subsequent actions of authority - Petition allowed.
ORDER :
SONIA GOKANI, J.
1. The petitioner is challenging the proceedings initiated by way of show cause notice dated 10.05.2022 issued by the department, which culminated into cancelling the registration of the petitioner firm under the provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (‘the CGST Act’ hereinafter).
2. Brief facts leading to the present petition are as follow:
2.1 The petitioner is registered under the Gujarat Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (‘the GGST Act’ hereinafter) having the Goods and Service Tax Identification No.24DHWPK1820G1ZA. The show cause notice dated 10.05.2022 came to be issued by the department in Form GST REG-17/31. This is in exercise of the powers under Section 29 of the CGST Act read with Rule 22(1) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 (‘the CGST Rules’ hereinafter). The show cause notice had not been sent to the petitioner physically nor any notice has been received by the petitioner by post or at his registered address.
2.2 Another grievance on the part of the petitioner is that no other document has been uploaded except the single page notice. For any allegation to be substantiated no reason is also reflected for the petitioner to meet with the challenge. The petitioner was asked to appear in person failing which on ex-parte basis this was to be decided on the basis of the available record. No time for personal hearing was granted and the show cause notice did not mentioned the name and designation of the person issuing the notice before whom and what time and place the petitioner needed to appear.
2.3 Although, it was extremely difficult for the petitioner, it is still attempted to upload on a portal a short reply stating that the notice was unintelligible for any prudent person to reply.
2.4 On 25.05.2022, the State Tax Officer, Ghatak 23(Ahmedabad) passed an order cancelling the registration of the petitioner firm. The order of cancellation did not record any reasons for cancellation of the GST registration and mentioned that the order of cancellation is as per the attached order. The order did not assign any particular reason for cancellation.
2.5 An application was preferred on 15.06.2022 seeking revocation of cancellation of registration. The department on 01.08.2022 rejected the application of the petitioner.
2.6 Aggrieved petitioner preferred the present petitioner with the following prayers:
(a) To issue a writ in the nature of certiorari and or any other appropriate writs, order or direction for calling of records of proceedings initiated pursuant to show cause notice dated 10.05.2022 and after perusing the same be pleased to quash and set aside show cause notice dated 10.05.2022 and order dated 25.05.2022 passed thereon by State Tax Officer, Ghatak 23, Ahmedabad, and be further pleased to direct restoration of registration bearing number 24DHWPK1820G1ZA;
(b) To pass an exparte ad interim order stating the operation, execution and implementation of the order dated 25.05.2022 bearing reference no.ZA240522131719M passed by State Tax Officer, Ghatak 23, Ahmedabad, pending the hearing and final disposal of present petition, and
(c) Grant such further and other interim reliefs, as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the present nature and circumstances of the case.”
3. This Court issued the notice on 12.10.2022 to the respondent authority.
4. Affidavit-in-reply is filed by the State Tax Officer, Unit-23 denying all allegations.
4.1 It is contended that the spot verification at the principal place of business was conducted on 07.05.2022, the same was found closed and non-functioning. The petitioner was contacted on his registered mobile No.9913883352, however, he could not be contacted as his number was switched off. He also did not support the on-going investigation nor had he given any statement in consonance with the requirement.
4.2 He was served with the detailed show cause notice, which was served through the RPAD to the principal place of the business of the
A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India 1970 1 SCR 457
Abdul Ghaffar vs. State of Bihar 2008 3 SCC 258
Kranti Associates (P) Ltd. vs. Masood Ahmed Khan 2010 9 SCC 496
MRF Mazdoor Sangh v. Commissioner of Labour 2014 (3) ALT 265
Ravi Yashwant Bhoir v. District Collector
Sant Lal Gupta v. Modern Cooperative Group Housing Society Ltd. 2010 13 SCC 336
SupremeToday
The court underscored the necessity of adhering to principles of natural justice, requiring that administrative orders affecting rights must include clear reasoning and a fair opportunity for respons....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the imperative nature of providing detailed reasons and ensuring compliance with principles of natural justice in quasi-judicial proceedings, parti....
Cancellation of GST registration must follow due process, including a clear show-cause notice and a reasoned order, to uphold the principles of natural justice.
An order cancelling a registration under statutory provisions must be a speaking order, assigning specific reasons for the decision. The failure of an assessee to respond to a show cause notice does ....
An adjudicating authority is mandatorily obligated to issue a reasoned, speaking order when cancelling a registration, regardless of whether a response was filed. Failure to provide specific reasons ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.