IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SONIA GOKANI, SANDEEP N. BHATT, JJ.
M/s Devi Products – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
R/Special Civil Application No. 2288 of 2023
Decided on : 15-02-2023
GST Acts - Cancellation of Registration Certificate - Section 139 of the GST Act, Rule 21 of the CGST Rules, Section 29 of the GST Act, Rule 22(1) of the GST Rules - The court quashed the show cause notice and the consequential order cancelling registration, directing the respondent to issue a fresh notice with specific reasons and details, and provide a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a sole proprietor engaged in trading, had his registration certificate under the GST Acts cancelled due to non-filing of returns for a continuous period of six months. The petitioner argued that the cancellation was done without recording any reasons and in violation of principles of natural justice.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the show cause notice and the consequential order cancelling registration were cryptic and unsustainable under the law. It emphasized the necessity of giving reasons for such decisions and the importance of providing a reasonable opportunity of hearing. The court also directed the respondent to issue a fresh notice with specific reasons and details, and provide a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
Issues: Violation of principles of natural justice, cryptic show cause notice, cancellation of registration without determination of the amount payable.
Ratio Decidendi: The absence of reasons renders an order indefensible and unsustainable, particularly when it is subject to appeal or revision. The court emphasized the importance of providing a reasonable opportunity of hearing and the necessity of giving specific details in show cause notices. It also highlighted the need for a speaking order with specific reasons and details.
Final Decision: The writ application was allowed, quashing the show cause notice and the consequential order cancelling registration, with liberty to the respondent to issue a fresh notice with particular reasons incorporating the details and a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, and to pass an appropriate speaking order.
ORDER :
SONIA GOKANI, J.
1. By way of the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner seeks to challenge the legality and validity of the order dated 24.03.2021 passed by the respondent No.2 whereby the registration certificate granted to the petitioner under the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and Gujarat Goods and Services Tax, 2017 (“GST Acts” for short) has been cancelled with effect from 01.07.2017. It is averred that the same has been done in violation of principles of natural justice.
2. Petitioner has challenged the show cause notice dated 15.03.2021 issued under Rule 21 of the CGST Rules and GST Rules whereby respondent No.2 suspended the registration certificate with immediate effect from 15.03.2021 itself.
3. Petitioner is sole proprietor engaged in the business of trading of article brass and was registered with the Gujarat Value Added Tax under the Gujarat Value Added Tax, 2003 and Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. He got his registration with effect from 01.07.2017 by virtue of Section 139 of the GST Act and he has granted final certificate of registration under the very provision. According to petitioner, till June, 2020, he had filed his return of income under the GST Act, however, because of the prevalent circumstances he had no business subsequent to June, 2020, and therefore he was of bonafide belief that there was no requirement to file return under the GST ACT.
4. A show cause notice was issued on 15.03.2021 under Rule 22(1) of the GST Rules read with Section 29 of the GST Act whereby the petitioner was informed that his registration was liable to be cancelled because he had not filed the return for a continuous period of six months and he was called upon to file his reply to the notice. It is also the grievance of the petitioner that his registration has been suspended with immediate effect on 15.03.2021 itself under Rule 21A of the GST Rules and this had been done without recording any reasons. Thereafter, the registration of his was cancelled by respondent No.2 with effect from 01.07.2017 without recording any particulars or the reasons or the grounds for cancellation. This orders since was cryptic and there is no tax demand determined, he is before this Court.
5. It is his say that due to Covid-19 pandemic his business was badly affect and in fact, there had been no business post June, 2020 period. The financial hardship that he suffered from July, 2020 had led him to believe that there was no requirement for GST return to file. His registration has been cancelled with effect 01.07.2017 for not filing return after June, 2020. Therefore, he has approached this Court with the following prayers :
(b) That this Honorable Court be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order directing the Respondents to forthwith restore the registration certificate (Annexure - C) of the Petitioner with effect from 01.07.2017; and
(c) Pending notice, admission and final disposal of this Petition, this Hon'ble Court by way of interim relief be pleased direct the respondent authorities to restore the registration of the Petitioner with effect from 01.07.2017; and
(d) Ex-parte ad-interim relief in term of Prayer 9(c) be granted; and
(e) For Costs; and
(f) That this Honorable Court be pleased to grant such other and further relief/s as are deemed just and proper in the facts and circumstances of this case.”
6. We have heard Mr.Kuntal Parikh, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner who has drawn our attention to the
MRF Mazdoor Sangh vs. The Commissioner of Labour & Others, reported in 2014 (3) ALT 265
AI
An order cancelling a registration under statutory provisions must be a speaking order, assigning specific reasons for the decision. The failure of an assessee to respond to a show cause notice does ....
The court underscored the necessity of adhering to principles of natural justice, requiring that administrative orders affecting rights must include clear reasoning and a fair opportunity for respons....
An adjudicating authority is mandatorily obligated to issue a reasoned, speaking order when cancelling a registration, regardless of whether a response was filed. Failure to provide specific reasons ....
An adjudicating authority exercising statutory power to cancel tax registration must record clear reasons for its decision. As a matter of natural justice and fair procedure, an order devoid of reaso....
Cancellation of GST registration must follow due process, including a clear show-cause notice and a reasoned order, to uphold the principles of natural justice.
GST registration cancellation quashed as arbitrary for ignoring proprietor's ill-health causing temporary business halt, issuing vague unreasoned show-cause notices, and passing mechanical orders wit....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.