SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Guj) 1703

ASHOKKUMAR C. JOSHI
BADHARSINH VAGHABHAI BARIYA – Appellant
Versus
RAJNIKANT RATANSINH PATEL – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : M.T.M. HAKIM.

JUDGMENT :

ASHOKKUMAR C. JOSHI, J.

1. This is an appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 arising out of the judgment and award dated 18.04.2012 rendered by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Dahod (the Tribunal) in Motor Accident Claim Petition No. 576 of 2005 (claim petition), whereby, the Tribunal was pleased to award compensation of Rs. 1,54,500/- with interest at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of claim petition till realization and proportionate cost against the total claim of Rs. 7.5 lakh as claimed by the appellants-original claimants towards the death of the deceased. Accordingly, the appellants have preferred this appeal for enhancement of compensation.

2. Nutshell facts are that on 28.09.2005, the deceased was travelling in a Jeep, which, as per the case of the claimants, dashed with a tree due to rash and negligent driving of the driver of the bus due to which, the deceased sustained grievous injuries and eventually, succumbed to the injuries, for which, the claimants filed the aforesaid claim petition claiming compensation to the tune o

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top