SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Guj) 1717

A. P. THAKER
Indumatiben Girjashaner Oza – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : MR ANSHIN H DESAI
For the Respondent: MR NIKUNJ KANARA, MR ASHISH M DAGLI

JUDGMENT :

1. By way of preferring this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner has sought the following reliefs:

    “[A] YOUR LORDSHIPS may be pleased to admit and allow this petition.

[B] YOUR LORDSHIPS may be pleased to call for R & P from the Office of the respondent No.2 – Collector, Surendranagar.

[C] YOUR LORDSHIPS may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, by directing the respondent No.2, Collector, Surendranagar, its officers, employees, agents and servants, to follow. the order dated 6/6/2007 – 14/6/2007 passed by the Joint Secretary, Revenue Department [Appeals] in Revision Application No. MVV/BKP/SNR/4/2007, at Annexure “J” to the petition, in the interest of justice.

[D] YOUR LORDSHIPS may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, by directing the respondent No.2, Collector, Surendranagar, its officers, employees, agents and servants, to grant application for N.A. Permission filed by the petitioner, dated 7/8/2006, at Annexure “F” to the petition. 7.

[E] Pending admission, hearing and f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top