SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Guj) 214

VIPUL M. PANCHOLI, HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK
STATE OF GUJARAT – Appellant
Versus
BHAKU KHODA KHANT – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : JIRGA JHAVERI.
For the Respondent: K.B. ANANDJIWALA.

JUDGMENT :

HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK, J.

1. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and order, Dated: 06.06.1994, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gondal (‘trial Court’ hereinafter), in Session Case No. 64 of 1990, whereby, the trial Court acquitted the original accused Nos. 1 to 5 of the charge of commission of the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 326 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in brief ‘IPC’) and Sections 37(1) and 135 of the Bombay Police Act, 1951, the appellant-State has preferred the present appeal.

2. At the outset, it may be noted that during the pendency of this appeal, original accused No. 2-appellant No. 2 passed away and therefore, this appeal survives qua original accused-appellant Nos. 1, 3, 4 and 5 only.

3. The brief facts of the prosecution, as was unfurled before the trial Court, reads thus:

    Kanjibhai Veljibhai Khant PW-16, who happens to be the real brother of the deceased-Govind Veljibhai, lodged a complaint with Gondal Police Station on 20.05.1990, wherein, he stated that they are total three brothers.

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top