BIREN VAISHNAV
Madhya Gujarat Vijli Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Appellate Authority And Electrical Inspector – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Rule returnable forthwith. Mr. Rohan Shah, learned advocate appearing for respondent – Appellate Authority and Electrical Inspector waives service of notice of rule. Though served, none appears for respondent no. 2 in Special Civil Application No. 9035 of 2018 and though served, none appears for respondent no. 1 in Special Civil Application No. 11589 of 2018. Heard Mr. Maulik Nanavati, learned advocate for the petitioner – Electricity Company and Mr. Rohan Shah, learned AGP for respondent – Appellate Authority and Electrical Inspector.
2. Challenge in these petitions is to the orders dated 29.01.2018 and 17.04.2018 passed by the Appellate Authority & Electrical Inspector, Division Office, Nadiad under section 127 of the Electricity Act, 2003.
3. The facts of Special Civil Application No. 9035 of 2018 indicate that it is the case of the petitioner electricity company that though respondent no. 2 was having a sanctioned limit of 25 KW, when the premises was checked on 25.05.2017, it was found that the respondent no. 2 was using 91.214 KW and therefore was in excess of the sanctioned load limits by 66.214 KW from the NRGP connection. The respondent no. 2 was issued a provis
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.