SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Guj) 272

SAMIR J. DAVE
JASHODABEN PUJABHAI SOLANKI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : PRITESH V. CHHATRIWALA.
For the Respondents: NISARG N. JAIN, H.K. PATEL.

JUDGMENT :

SAMIR J. DAVE, J.

1. By way of present application, the applicant has prayed to quash and set aside judgment and order dated 02.08.2021 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Vadodara in Criminal Misc. Application No. 408 of 2019.

2. Heard learned advocates for the respective parties as well as learned APP for the respondent-State.

3. Brief facts of the case are that son of the present applicant got married with respondent no. 2 under the Hindu rites and rituals. Thereafter, both lived together as husband and wife and out of the said wedlock, there were two children. The respondent no. 2 thereafter was driven away by the son of the applicant by giving physical and mental torture and also did not take care for providing any maintenance to her and their two children. Therefore, the respondent no. 2-wife has filed Criminal Misc. Application No. 318 of 1999, which was partly allowed by the learned JMFC, Vadodara vide order dated 31.01.2004 and the learned Family Court has granted maintenance of Rs.1,500/- per month in all to respondent no. 2-wife and two children (Rs.500/- each). Being aggrieved by the said order the respondent no. 2-wife has filed Criminal Misc. Application

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top