IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE, J.
SUNILBHAI PANCHANBHAI MAKWANA – Appellant
Versus
NANIBEN BIJALBHAI SOLANKI – Respondent
First Appeal No. 549 of 2019, Civil Application (For Stay) No. 1 of 2019
Decided On : 02-05-2023
Succession Certificate - Indian Succession Act - Section 372, Section 374, Section 377, Section 381
Fact of the Case:
The appellant sought a Succession Certificate for movable and immovable properties, and retiral benefits of the deceased brother, who died issueless. The trial court dismissed the application, stating that the scope of the issuance of the Succession Certificate under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act is confined only to the extent of debts and securities.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that a Succession Certificate under Section 372 can only be applied for in respect of debts and securities, not movable and immovable properties. The court also noted that the provisions of Part-X of the Indian Succession Act relate only to debts and securities, and the Certificate is conclusive only with respect to debts and securities.
Issues: The main issue was the interpretation of Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act and whether it allows for the grant of a Succession Certificate for movable and immovable properties.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act only entitles the holder of the Certificate to realize the debts of the deceased and discharge a debt, and it is unconnected with the right to the estate of the deceased owner. The court also clarified that the judgment relied upon by the appellant was not applicable to the present case.
Final Decision: The First Appeal was dismissed as the court found no interference was called for in the interpretation of Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act.
JUDGMENT :
ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE, J.
1. The present First Appeal impugns the judgment and order dated 10.12.2018 passed by the Additional Civil Judge, Bhuj-Kachchh in Civil Misc. Application No. 56 of 2016.
2. The brief facts leading to the present First Appeal are as under:
2.2 It is the case of the appellant that his brother, deceased -Sukdevbhai Panchabhai Makwana, had left behind properties, being House No. M998 in 63 MIG plan Kailash Nagar Bhuj, developed Gujarat Housing Board located in revenue Survey No. 870/P. Bank Locker No. 758 (key no. 60240) in State Bank of India, Dhanidhar Char Rasta, Ahmedabad. Retirement Benefits such as gratuity, pension, insurance claim, provident fund, etc. Accordingly, the appellant herein, preferred the Civil Misc. Application No. 56 of 2016 under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act along-with the said application. The appellant also annexed the affidavits of the three sisters of the deceased- Sukdevbhai Panchabhai Makwana, stating that they endorse the contents and averments in application for Succession Certificate and give their consent for the grant of such Certificate. By the impugned judgment and order dated 10.12.2018, the learned Additional Civil Judge, Bhuj-Kachchh was pleased to dismiss the application for Succession Certificate holding that the scope of the issuance of the Succession Certificate under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act is confined only to the extent of debts and securities. Hence, the First Appeal.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the learned Trial Court has misread the provisions of Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act. He submits that the appellant herein has prayed for the Succession Certificate to the movable and immovable properties, and the retiral benefits of the deceased brother, who had died issueless and his wife had also pre-deceased him. He submits that the sisters of the deceased-Sukdevbhai Panchabhai Makwana had also consented for grant of Succession Certificate to the appellant and they had no objection for the same. He submits that the appellant was only the legal heir. Learned counsel for the appellant has relied on the judgment reported in 2017 SCC Online Del 7963 of the Delhi High Court, wherein, the High Court has granted the Succession Certificate holding that it is the entitlement to the estate/movable properties which is to be ascertained in favour of the person making such application for the formal Succession Certificate to be issued. No other contentions have been raised by the learned counsel for the appellant.
4. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and perused the documents on record.
5. At the outset, it is noted that the respondents are the real sisters of the deceased and the appellant herein. They have filed an affidavit in the proceedings before the learned Trial Court stating that they have no objections if a Succession Certificate is issued to the appellant herein in the present proceedings. Also, though, the respondent sisters have been duly served with the notice, none has chosen to appear in the present proceedings.
6. In the present case, it would be beneficial to refer Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, which reads as under:
(1) Application for su
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a Succession Certificate under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act is limited to debts and securities, and does not extend to movable and....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the Indian Succession Act only allows for the issuance of a Succession Certificate for debts and securities, not for immovable property.
Succession Certificate – Courts are required to deal with application under Section 372 of Succession Act in a summary manner without asking for strict proof as contemplated under Indian Evidence Act....
The court clarified that proceedings under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act are summary and do not grant final adjudication of rights, allowing for provisional determinations to meet urgent n....
Nominees under insurance policies do not hold beneficial interest; legal heirs must pursue civil suits for rights determination despite summary nature of succession certificate proceedings.
Succession Certificate – Grant of Succession Certificate merely identifies hands in which death benefits/debts/securities be given – Scope to determining shares of parties would not be available in p....
Section 373 merely lays down that Court is required to be satisfied that there is ground for entertaining application namely by a person who desires to make a claim.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the court's interpretation and application of the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, particularly Sections 376, 387, 373(3), and 375(1), i....
judgment and decree passed by the learned First Appellate Court having come to the conclusion that the proceedings for obtaining Succession Certificate was defective and the Certificate was obtained ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.