SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Guj) 386

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE, J.
SUNILBHAI PANCHANBHAI MAKWANA – Appellant
Versus
NANIBEN BIJALBHAI SOLANKI – Respondent
First Appeal No. 549 of 2019, Civil Application (For Stay) No. 1 of 2019
Decided On : 02-05-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : S.P. MAJMUDAR, H.J. KARATHIYA.

The main legal point established in the judgment is that a Succession Certificate under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act is limited to debts and securities, and does not extend to movable and immovable properties.

Headnote:

Succession Certificate - Indian Succession Act - Section 372, Section 374, Section 377, Section 381

Fact of the Case:

The appellant sought a Succession Certificate for movable and immovable properties, and retiral benefits of the deceased brother, who died issueless. The trial court dismissed the application, stating that the scope of the issuance of the Succession Certificate under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act is confined only to the extent of debts and securities.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that a Succession Certificate under Section 372 can only be applied for in respect of debts and securities, not movable and immovable properties. The court also noted that the provisions of Part-X of the Indian Succession Act relate only to debts and securities, and the Certificate is conclusive only with respect to debts and securities.

Issues: The main issue was the interpretation of Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act and whether it allows for the grant of a Succession Certificate for movable and immovable properties.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act only entitles the holder of the Certificate to realize the debts of the deceased and discharge a debt, and it is unconnected with the right to the estate of the deceased owner. The court also clarified that the judgment relied upon by the appellant was not applicable to the present case.

Final Decision: The First Appeal was dismissed as the court found no interference was called for in the interpretation of Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act.

JUDGMENT :

ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE, J.

1. The present First Appeal impugns the judgment and order dated 10.12.2018 passed by the Additional Civil Judge, Bhuj-Kachchh in Civil Misc. Application No. 56 of 2016.

2. The brief facts leading to the present First Appeal are as under:

    2.1 The appellant herein is the brother of deceased- Shri Sukdevbhai Panchabhai Makwana, who expired on 06.03.2016 at village-Kavitha, Taluka-Bawla, District-Ahmedabad after getting retired from service on 18.11.2014. The wife of the deceased-Sukdevbhai Panchabhai Makwana, namely Smt. Lakshmiben Sukdevbhai Makwana had pre-deceased the said Sukdevbhai Panchabhai Makwana on 29.10.2013. Both the deceased had died issueless. The appellant herein was residing with his deceased-brother for most of the time after the death of Smt. Lakshmiben Sukdevbhai Makwana. The deceased-Sukdevbhai Panchabhai Makwana was working in the Gujarat Agricultural Department till his retirement on medical grounds on 18.11.2014.

2.2 It is the case of the appellant that his brother, deceased -Sukdevbhai Panchabhai Makwana, had left behind properties, being House No. M998 in 63 MIG plan Kailash Nagar Bhuj, developed Gujarat Housing Board located in revenue Survey No. 870/P. Bank Locker No. 758 (key no. 60240) in State Bank of India, Dhanidhar Char Rasta, Ahmedabad. Retirement Benefits such as gratuity, pension, insurance claim, provident fund, etc. Accordingly, the appellant herein, preferred the Civil Misc. Application No. 56 of 2016 under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act along-with the said application. The appellant also annexed the affidavits of the three sisters of the deceased- Sukdevbhai Panchabhai Makwana, stating that they endorse the contents and averments in application for Succession Certificate and give their consent for the grant of such Certificate. By the impugned judgment and order dated 10.12.2018, the learned Additional Civil Judge, Bhuj-Kachchh was pleased to dismiss the application for Succession Certificate holding that the scope of the issuance of the Succession Certificate under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act is confined only to the extent of debts and securities. Hence, the First Appeal.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the learned Trial Court has misread the provisions of Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act. He submits that the appellant herein has prayed for the Succession Certificate to the movable and immovable properties, and the retiral benefits of the deceased brother, who had died issueless and his wife had also pre-deceased him. He submits that the sisters of the deceased-Sukdevbhai Panchabhai Makwana had also consented for grant of Succession Certificate to the appellant and they had no objection for the same. He submits that the appellant was only the legal heir. Learned counsel for the appellant has relied on the judgment reported in 2017 SCC Online Del 7963 of the Delhi High Court, wherein, the High Court has granted the Succession Certificate holding that it is the entitlement to the estate/movable properties which is to be ascertained in favour of the person making such application for the formal Succession Certificate to be issued. No other contentions have been raised by the learned counsel for the appellant.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and perused the documents on record.

5. At the outset, it is noted that the respondents are the real sisters of the deceased and the appellant herein. They have filed an affidavit in the proceedings before the learned Trial Court stating that they have no objections if a Succession Certificate is issued to the appellant herein in the present proceedings. Also, though, the respondent sisters have been duly served with the notice, none has chosen to appear in the present proceedings.

6. In the present case, it would be beneficial to refer Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, which reads as under:

    “372. Application for certificate:

(1) Application for su

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top