SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DEVAN M. DESAI
Rakeshkumar Ramanbhai Patel – Appellant
Versus
None – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Gopal M Pandya (3400), Advocate and Mr. Vishal T. Patel (6518), Advocate for the Appellant and for the Defendant

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

Heard learned advocate Mr. Vishal T. Patel for the appellant. Perused the record.

2. By way of this appeal under Section 384 of the Indian Succession Act, the challenge is made against the order dated 14.8.2023 passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge, Dehgam, District Gandhinagar in Civil Misc. Application No.8 of 2022.

3. The brief facts leading to filing of the present appeal are as under:

3.1 The present appellant filed Civil Misc. Application No.8 of 2022 for ‘Succession Certificate’ of movable property of late Natvarlal Chhotalal Patel and his wife Champaben Natvarlal Patel, under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The appellant claimed to be the nephew of late Natvarlal Chhotalal Patel who passed away on 16.11.2021 and his wife late Champaben Natvarlal Patel passed away on 10.1.2017 at Dehgam. The relationship between the appellant and deceased are that of nephew, uncle - aunty.

4. Submissions of learned advocate for the appellant are as under:

4.1 The appellant filed Civil Misc. Application No.8 of 2022 for ‘Succession Certificate’ of the movable property of late Natvarlal Chhotalal Patel and his wife Champaben Natvarlal Patel, under Section

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top