SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Guj) 352

S. V. PINTO
Nareshkumar Lilachnad Shah – Appellant
Versus
Kamlesh H. Doshi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. A.V. Prajapati.
For the Defendants : Mr. Palak H. Thakkar.

JUDGMENT :

1. Though served, no one has appeared for the respondent Nos.1, 2, 4 and 5.

2. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant – original claimant under section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act (“the Act” for short) being aggrieved and dissatisfied by the judgment and award passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux), Valsad in Motor Accident Claims Petition No.122 of 2006 (old MACP No.280 of 1999) on 30.8.2007.

3. The brief facts of the case that emerge from the record are as under.

3.1 That on11.8.1995 at around 2.30 am the claimant was travelling in Maruti Car No.GJ 15 C 4447 which was being driven by the opponent No.1 and was in the ownership of the opponent No.2 and was going from Udaipur to Kesaryaji and when they reached near Govardhan Vilas near Kesaryaji within the jurisdiction of Udaipur Police Chowki, the opponent No.4 came driving Maruti Gypsy No.DD 03 1775, which was in the ownership of the opponent No.5, rashly and negligently and came on the wrong side of the road and dashed with the Maruti Car in which the claimant was travelling. The claimant

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top