Wahidsab Badasabmiya Saiyed vs Hardevsingh Mahednrasing Jat [Deleted]

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Guj) 1631

NIRAL R. MEHTA
Wahidsab Badasabmiya Saiyed – Appellant
Versus
Hardevsingh Mahednrasing Jat [Deleted] – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Kartikey P Rawal
For the Respondent: Mr Sunil B Parikh

JUDGMENT :

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied by the judgment and award dated 30.11.2005 passed in Motor Accident Claims Petition No.867 of 1998 by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux.), Judge, Court No.13, Ahmedabad, the appellant – original claimant has preferred the present appeal under section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act (“the Act” for short).

2. The original claim of the claimant was for Rs.20,00,000/-. However, the Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs.8,34,420/- with 7.5% interest under the various heads as under :

Future loss of income	Rs.5,46,720/-
Loss of income	Rs.72,000/-
Pain, Shock and Suffering	Rs.50,000/-
Tickets and travelling expenses	Rs.11,769/-
Medical treatment	Rs.1,34,000/-
Special diet and attendant charges along with transportation charges	Rs.20,000/-
Total	Rs.8,34,420/-

3. It is the case of the claimant that on 30.8.1997 the claimant along with one Cleaner were going to Jaisalmer. The claimant being the driver was driving Swaraj Mazda truck loaded with ice-cream bearing No.GJ 1 T 7420. While the truck d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(Guj) 1631

NIRAL R. MEHTAWahidsab Badasabmiya Saiyed – AppellantVersusHardevsingh Mahednrasing Jat [Deleted] – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

NIRAL R. MEHTA
Wahidsab Badasabmiya Saiyed – Appellant
Versus
Hardevsingh Mahednrasing Jat [Deleted] – Respondent