N. V. ANJARIA, DEVAN M. DESAI
Munjal M Jaykrishna Family Trust – Appellant
Versus
Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1) – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(N.V. Anjaria, J.)
Heard learned advocate Mr. Darshan Patel for the petitioner and learned advocate Mr. Varun Patel for the respondent, at length.
2. By filling the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner has prayed to set aside notice dated 28.3.2021 issued by the Assessing Officer under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 seeking to reopen the assessment of the petitioner for the Assessment Year 2017- 2018 stating that he had reasons to believe that income of the petitioner chargeable to tax for the assessment year under consideration had escaped tax within the meaning of section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
3. Noticing the basic facts, it was stated that the petitioner is a family trust, which filed the petition through one of the trustees-the authorised signatory. It is the case that the petitioner Trust filed return of income for the Assessment Year 2017-2018 on 28.2.2018 disclosing income of Rs. 72,750/-. While according to the petitioner, it disclosed all material facts fully, the notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) was received by the petitioner. Thereby, the assessment
Chhugamal Rajpal vs. S. P. Sharma
Raymond Woollen Mills Limited vs. Income Tax Officer, Centre Circle XI, Range Bombay and Others
The main legal point established is that the Assessing Officer's belief for the reassessment of income under section 148 of the Income Tax Act is based on subjective satisfaction and the existence of....
Point of law: It is no doubt true that the Court cannot go into the sufficiency or adequacy of the material and substitute its own opinion for that of the Income Tax Officer on the point as to whethe....
Point of Law : Sufficiency of the evidence or material is not open to scrutiny by the Court but the existence of the belief is the sine qua non for a valid exercise of power.
The court emphasized the need for tangible material to believe that income had escaped assessment and held that the power to grant approval for re-opening an assessment is coupled with a duty and can....
Under section 147 of the Act the proceedings for the reassessment can be initiated only if the Assessing Officer has reason to believe that any income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment for any....
Assessing Officer having arrived at his subjective satisfaction based on additional fresh material placed before him that the petitioner had not fully and truly disclosed all the material facts neces....
Reopening of assessment under the Income Tax Act after four years is impermissible without failure to disclose material facts; mere change of opinion does not justify such action.
Intimation under section 143(1)(a) was deemed to be a notice of demand under section 156, for the apparent purpose of making machinery provisions relating to recovery of tax applicable. By such appli....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the re-opening of a concluded assessment cannot be based on a mere change of opinion by the Assessing Officer, and the duty of the assessee is....
It is settled law that, at the stage of Section 148 of the Act, what is required is “reason to believe”, but not the established fact of escapement of income. This aspect has been considered by the A....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.